Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 28;11(1):152. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010152

Table 2.

Baseline imaging characteristics of study population (n = 104).

Variable Value
Aortic valve morphology
Trileaflet, N (%) 14 (13.6)
Bicuspid, N (%) 79 (76.7)
Unicuspid/quadricuspid, N (%) 4 (4)
Unknown, N (%) 6 (6)
Aortic regurgitation assessment
Integrative approach
Moderate-to-severe AR, N (%) 56 (54)
Severe AR, N (%) 48 (46)
2D echo vena contracta width, mm 6.5 ± 1.5
Diastolic flow reversal velocity, cm/s 19.4 ± 4.3
2D echo regurgitant volume, mL 52 ± 48
2D echo regurgitant fraction, % 36 ± 18
3D echo vena contracta area, mm2 29 ± 13
CMR regurgitation volume, mL 50 ± 28
CMR regurgitation fraction, % 38 ± 17
Left ventricle assessment
2D echo end-diastolic diameter, mm 58 ± 6
2D echo end-systolic diameter, mm 37 ± 5
2D echo end-systolic diameter index, mm/m2 18 ± 3
2D echo end-diastolic volume, mL 158 ± 68.0
2D echo end-systolic volume, mL 56 ± 32
2D echo ejection fraction, % 64 ± 6
3D echo end-diastolic volume, mL 177 ± 51
3D echo end-diastolic volume index, mL/m2 86 ± 23
3D echo end-systolic volume, mL 69 ± 24
3D echo end-systolic volume index, mL/m2 33 ± 11
3D echo ejection fraction, % 62 ± 5
CMR end-diastolic volume, mL 234 ± 81
CMR end-diastolic volume index, mL/m2 118 ± 30
CMR end-systolic volume, mL 88 ± 51
CMR end-systolic volume index, mL/m2 43 ± 23
CMR ejection fraction, % 61 ± 6

Values are means ± standard deviations or numbers (percentage). 2D: two-dimensional, 3D: three-dimensional, echo: echocardiography, CMR: cardiac magnetic resonance.