Jalihal 1990.
Methods | RCT with Cross‐over design | |
Participants | 20 patients Gastro intestinal outpatients clinic Diagnoses on clinical grounds Mean age 38 years 20% female |
|
Interventions | Bulking agent 4 weeks ispaghula husk 30 g/day | |
Outcomes | Abdominal pain, dichotomous Global assessment, dichotomous | |
Notes | GI Outpatients No run‐in | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Adequate |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double‐blind, treatment was indistinguishable from the placebo |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No drop‐outs. Two patients were eligible but dropped out before the study. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Expected outcomes were reported |
Other bias | Low risk | The study appears to be free of other sources of bias |