Nigam 1984.
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | 168 patients Secondary care Mean age 34.5 years 45% female |
|
Interventions | Bulking agents Ispaghula husk, unclear dose, 12 weeks Spasmolitic agent Hyoscinebutylbromide, unclear dose, 12 weeks |
|
Outcomes | Global assessment, dichotomous | |
Notes | Inclear dose of intervention No run in |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Double‐blind, double‐dummy |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No drop‐outs |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Expected outcomes reported |
Other bias | Low risk | The study appears to be free of other sources of bias |