Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 26;15(1):153. doi: 10.3390/ma15010153

Table 6.

A summary of the in silico methods for evaluating the performance of knee joint replacements.

Type of Method Advantages and Disadvantages Representative Example References
Musculoskeletal model Able to simulate the activities of the human body;
wear mechanism was not considered
graphic file with name materials-15-00153-i019.jpg [44]
Combines the advantages of numerical and experimental methods graphic file with name materials-15-00153-i020.jpg [45]
Coupled musculoskeletal-FE model Reflects the stress state more comprehensively; lack of in vivo measurements graphic file with name materials-15-00153-i021.jpg [46]
Deformable contact models of the hip are considered;
the accuracy can be improved
graphic file with name materials-15-00153-i022.jpg [47]
FE model The mechanical information is comprehensive; difficult to develop the model graphic file with name materials-15-00153-i023.jpg [48]
The effect of simulation prediction is good graphic file with name materials-15-00153-i024.jpg [49]