Table 1.

Quality scores for included RCTs in the review using the ErasmusAGE quality assessment tool.

Author	Design	Size	Exposure	Outcome	Adjustment	Total	Quality
Borgen et al. [41]	2	2	1	2	1	8	High
Guo et al. [34]	2	2	0	2	0	6	High
Given et al. [35]	2	1	0	2	1	6	High
Caballero-Ruiz et al. [40]	2	1	0	2	1	7	High
Dalfrà et al. [37]	2	2	0	2	0	6	High
Miremberg et al. [30]	2	2	0	2	0	6	High
Carolan-Olah and Sayakhot [39]	2	2	0	1	0	5	Moderate
Rigla et al. [29]	2	2	0	2	0	6	High
Kennelly et al. [31]	2	2	0	2	0	6	High
Carral et al. [38]	2	2	0	2	0	6	High
Sayakhot et al. [27]	2	2	0	2	0	6	High
Roozbahani et al. [28]	2	1	0	2	0	5	Moderate