Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 21;14(1):13. doi: 10.3390/nu14010013

Table 3.

Adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for risk of new-onset obesity according to multi-trajectories, 1991–2018.

Trajectories Model 1 1 Model 2 2 Model 3 3
p Value HR (95% CI) p Value HR (95% CI) p Value HR (95% CI)
Urban trajectories
IMP&HF&LC (versus (vs.) ABM) 0.605 0.85 (0.45, 1.59) 0.532 0.79 (0.38, 1.64) 0.671 0.85 (0.41, 1.79)
MP&VHF&VLC (vs. ABM) 0.945 0.97 (0.41, 2.31) 0.915 1.05 (0.40, 2.78) 0.912 1.06 (0.39, 2.85)
MP&ILF&DHC (vs. ABM) 0.423 0.65 (0.22, 1.88) 0.798 0.86 (0.28, 2.66) 0.709 0.80 (0.26, 2.52)
Rural trajectories
MP&ILF&DHC (vs. BM) 0.681 1.08 (0.74, 1.57) 0.716 1.09 (0.69, 1.73) 0.948 0.98 (0.61, 1.58)
DMP&DHF&IMC (vs. BM) 0.168 0.72 (0.45, 1.15) 0.106 0.62 (0.35, 1.11) 0.034 0.50 (0.27, 0.95)
IMP&IHF&DLC (vs. BM) 0.052 0.67 (0.45, 1.00) 0.017 0.53 (0.32, 0.89) 0.008 0.48 (0.28, 0.83)

1 Model 1 is adjusted by age, gender, residence in north or south region, education, and family income. 2 Model 2 is further adjusted by alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, fruit intake, vegetable intake, PA, ST, and sleep time. 3 Model 3 is further adjusted by baseline BMI, WC, total energy intake, and disease history (including diabetes, myocardial infarction, and stroke).