Table 3.
Trajectories | Model 1 1 | Model 2 2 | Model 3 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p Value | HR (95% CI) | p Value | HR (95% CI) | p Value | HR (95% CI) | |
Urban trajectories | ||||||
IMP&HF&LC (versus (vs.) ABM) | 0.605 | 0.85 (0.45, 1.59) | 0.532 | 0.79 (0.38, 1.64) | 0.671 | 0.85 (0.41, 1.79) |
MP&VHF&VLC (vs. ABM) | 0.945 | 0.97 (0.41, 2.31) | 0.915 | 1.05 (0.40, 2.78) | 0.912 | 1.06 (0.39, 2.85) |
MP&ILF&DHC (vs. ABM) | 0.423 | 0.65 (0.22, 1.88) | 0.798 | 0.86 (0.28, 2.66) | 0.709 | 0.80 (0.26, 2.52) |
Rural trajectories | ||||||
MP&ILF&DHC (vs. BM) | 0.681 | 1.08 (0.74, 1.57) | 0.716 | 1.09 (0.69, 1.73) | 0.948 | 0.98 (0.61, 1.58) |
DMP&DHF&IMC (vs. BM) | 0.168 | 0.72 (0.45, 1.15) | 0.106 | 0.62 (0.35, 1.11) | 0.034 | 0.50 (0.27, 0.95) |
IMP&IHF&DLC (vs. BM) | 0.052 | 0.67 (0.45, 1.00) | 0.017 | 0.53 (0.32, 0.89) | 0.008 | 0.48 (0.28, 0.83) |
1 Model 1 is adjusted by age, gender, residence in north or south region, education, and family income. 2 Model 2 is further adjusted by alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, fruit intake, vegetable intake, PA, ST, and sleep time. 3 Model 3 is further adjusted by baseline BMI, WC, total energy intake, and disease history (including diabetes, myocardial infarction, and stroke).