Table 2.
Entry | Experimental Variable | Mass % of Dissolved Silk Fibroin, SF-m% a | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Temperature, °C | χ DMSO b | BuMeImAcO c | C3OMeImAcO c | AlBzMe2AcO c | Bu4NAcO c | |
1 | 40 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
2 | 40 | 0.7 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
3 | 40 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
4 | 60 | 0.5 | 10.0 | 7.4 | 0.9 | 4.0 |
5 | 60 | 0.7 | 11.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 |
6 | 60 | 0.7 | 11.5 | 9.9 | 3.5 | 5.0 |
7 | 60 | 0.7 | 11.5 | 10.0 | 3.5 | 5.0 |
8 | 60 | 0.7 | 11.5 | 8.0 | 3.5 | 5.9 |
9 | 60 | 0.9 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 4.8 |
10 | 80 | 0.5 | 11.0 | 13.3 | 7.0 | 14.0 |
11 | 80 | 0.7 | 12.0 | 14.4 | 8.0 | 16.0 |
12 | 80 | 0.9 | 7.0 | 6.6 | 4.0 | 11.0 |
a—Mass percent of dissolved silk fibroin = [mass dissolved SF/(mass dissolved SF + mass IL + mass DMSO)] × 100. Based on the results of the central points for which we have more data points, we calculated the uncertainty in SF-m% from [(SF-m%maximum value − SF-m%minimum value)/SF-m%maximum value) × 100. Eliminating the (single) worst offender for each IL, we have the following uncertainties: 4.3, 20.0; 14.3, and 16.7% for BuMeImAcO, C3OMeImAcO, AlBzMe2NAcO, and Bu4NAcO, respectively. b—χDMSO = Concentration of dimethyl sulfoxide in the binary solvent on in the mole fraction scale. c—Abbreviations: BuMeIm AcO = 1-(n-butyl)-3-methyimidazolium acetate; C3OMeIm AcO = 1 1-(2-methoxyethyl)-3-methylimidazolium acetate; Bu4NAcO = tetra(n-butyl)ammonium acetate; AlBzMe2AcO = allylbenzyldimethyl ammonium acetate.