Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 30;14(1):178. doi: 10.3390/nu14010178

Table 3.

Associations between serum holotranscobalamin (holoTC) and metabolic risk factors; Cameroon study.

Outcome Difference in Outcome per 1 SD (34.3 pmol/L) of Serum holoTC
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
β (95% CI) p-Value β (95% CI) p-Value β (95% CI) p-Value
Metabolic syndrome score, (n = 491) 0.33 (0.10 to 0.56) 0.004 0.17 (−0.05 to 0.39) 0.127 0.04 (−0.16 to 0.23) 0.70
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg), (n = 500) 1.72 (0.001 to 3.44) 0.050 0.49 (−1.16 to 2.14) 0.561 0.08 (−1.60 to 1.76) 0.923
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), (n = 500) 1.50 (0.39 to 2.62) 0.008 0.65 (−0.42 to 1.71) 0.234 0.32 (−0.75 to 1.38) 0.561
Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L), (n = 500) 0.10 (−0.03 to 0.22) 0.121 0.07 (−0.07 to 0.21) 0.323 0.05 (−0.09 to 0.18) 0.502
2-h blood glucose (mmol/L), (n = 494) 0.22 (0.05 to 0.40) 0.014 0.12 (−0.05 to 0.30) 0.162 0.12 (−0.06 to 0.29) 0.187
HOMA-IR, (n = 497) 0.09 (−0.003 to 0.18) 0.059 0.12 (0.03 to 0.23) 0.012 0.08 (−0.01 to 0.18) 0.075
Triglycerides (mmol/L), (n = 491) 0.03 (−0.006 to 0.07) 0.10 0.02 (−0.02 to 0.06) 0.313 0.01 (−0.03 to 0.05) 0.475
HDL cholesterol (mmol/L), (n = 491) 0.02 (−0.01 to 0.05) 0.165 0.01 (−0.02 to 0.03) 0.678 0.01 (−0.02 to 0.04) 0.647

HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; β, β-coefficient; CI, confidence interval. Model 1: Unadjusted. Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex, education level, smoking, alcohol intake, residential site. Model 3: Model 2 + body mass index + objectively measured physical activity.