Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 11;239(1):59–81. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-06039-8

Table 2.

Effect of 7-chloro-4-(phenylselanyl) quinoline (4-PSQ) or paroxetine or donepezil on the activity of monoamine oxidase (MAO)-A and B isoforms in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus of mice subjected to acute restraint stress (ARS)

Prefrontal cortex Hippocampus
Experimental groups MAO A MAO B MAO A MAO B
Non-stressed – control 0.54 ± 0.09 0.65 ± 0.06 0.99 ± 0.09 1.05 ± 0.09
Non-stressed – 4-PSQ 0.82 ± 0.05 0.55 ± 0.11 1.65 ± 0.30 1.60 ± 0.06
ARS—stressed 1.73 ± 0.12**** 1.22 ± 0.09** 2.26 ± 0.14** 1.71 ± 0.11**
ARS – 4-PSQ 0.42 ± 0.04#### 0.68 ± 0.08# 1.05 ± 0.12## 1.11 ± 0.16#
ARS—Paroxetine 1.46 ± 0.15 ****& 0.93 ± 0.14 1.28 ± 0.20# 1.28 ± 0.12
ARS—Donepezil 1.45 ± 0.15****& 1.16 ± 0.15* 2.70 ± 0.30****& 1.58 ± 0.17

Values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (S.E.M.) (n = 7). (**) denotes p < 0.01 and (****) denotes p < 0.0001 when compared to the non-stressed control group. (#) denotes p < 0.05, (##) denotes p < 0.01, and (####) denotes p < 0.0001 when compared to the ARS-induced group. (&) denotes p < 0.05 when compared to the ARS + 4-PSQ group (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test)