Johnson 1985.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised double‐blind clinical trial. Women were divided into a control and an experimental group in a double blind design. The trial was conducted in the United States of America. |
|
Participants | 81 normotensive and 34 medicated hypertensive women Age: between 35 and 65 years |
|
Interventions | Intervention group: 3 daily tablets of a calcium carbonate supplement containing 500 mg calcium per tablet Control group: placebo tablets Trial duration: 4 years |
|
Outcomes | Bone mineral content and blood pressure | |
Notes | Most of the women were using thiazides. "Dietary calcium of all women was determined using a precoded food record form, which had been tested for validity against weighed food intakes". This study was supported by Wisconsin Milk Marketing Board, Inc, Marion Laboratories, Kansas City, MO. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | "The original group of women, including the hypertensives, was divided into a control and an experimental group in a double‐blind design". However, methods were not described. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | "Blood pressure was measured from the right arm of seated participants using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer". Not reported if outcome assessors were blinded to the intervention |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 44 participants were randomised to the intervention and 41 were analysed. 51 participants were randomised to placebo and 40 were analysed. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All primary outcomes were reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. |