Table 3:
Non-Hispanic White | Chinese | Non-Hispanic Black | Hispanic | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(N=1607) | (N=396) | (N=875) | (N=756) | |
Estimate (95% CI) | Estimate (95% CI) | Estimate (95% CI) | Estimate (95% CI) | |
Distance to favorable food stores (p=0.27) | −0.28 (−0.58, 0.02) | −0.11 (−1.49, 1.26) | −1.05 (−1.82, −0.29) | −0.95 (−2.00, 0.10) |
Density of favorable food stores* (p=0.01) | 0.91 (0.34, 1.48) | −0.47 (−3.27, 2.33) | 1.71 (1.01, 2.41) | −0.22 (−0.82, 0.38) |
Healthy food perception (survey)* (p=0.03) | 0.52 (0.04, 1.00) | 1.90 (0.44, 3.35) | 1.21 (0.63, 1.79) | 2.66 (1.74, 3.58) |
Composite food environment (survey and GIS) (p=0.25) | 0.85 (0.34, 1.37) | 2.07 (0.14, 4.01) | 1.73 (1.11, 2.35) | 0.89 (0.14, 1.65) |
p value displayed is for the interaction term between food environment measure and race/ethnicity; statistically significant using p<0.05 as the threshold.
Racial/ethnic groups are non-Hispanic unless otherwise noted
Three-level hierarchical random effect models assessed race/ethnicity-stratified average food environment score and average AHEI score over time and between individuals
Models adjust for age, sex, education, moving status, per capita adjusted income, neighborhood SES