Table 1.
Phenotypic (rp), among-individual (rind), and within-individual (re) correlations between unadjusted TEE and FM (Models 1 + 3) and unadjusted TEE and body fat percentage (Models 2 + 4).
| Model | Traits | rp (95% CI) | rind (95% CI) | re (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Model 1 | TEE × FM | −0.07 (−0.16–0.04) | −0.09 (−0.21–0.05) | 0.04 (−0.10–0.16) |
| Model 2 | TEE × % FM | −0.04 (−0.14–0.07) | −0.01 (−0.15–0.12) | −0.05 (−0.19–0.06) | |
| B | Model 3 | TEE × FM | 0.09 (−0.16–0.31) | 0.07 (−0.29–0.40) | 0.29 (−0.02–0.47) |
| Model 4 | TEE × % FM | 0.19 (−0.06–0.38) | −0.23 (−0.14–0.50) | 0.18 (−0.09–0.40) |
A shows result using the entire dataset (N = 267 subjects) and B shows the results using a subset (N = 53 subjects) for which the time between measurements exceeded 4 weeks. Correlations are presented with 95% credible intervals (CIs).
TEE total energy expenditure, FM fat mass, % FM body fat percentage.