Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 30;28(1):131–144. doi: 10.5056/jnm21020

Table 1.

Clinical and Manometric Parameters of Patients Who Underwent Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy and Pneumatic Dilatation

Parameters POEM (n = 30) PD (n = 17) P-value
Sex (male/female) 15/15 7/10 0.564
Age (yr) 51.03 ± 15.13 48.47 ± 16.36 0.591
BMI (kg/m2) 21.90 ± 3.22 22.05 ± 4.08 0.892
Follow-up period (mo) 20.67 ± 7.95 25.29 ± 8.96 0.074
Type of achalasia 0.948
Type I 8 (26.7) 4 (23.5)
Type II 10 (33.3) 7 (41.2)
Type III 12 (40.0) 6 (35.3)
Pre-procedural parameters
Eckardt score 6.90 ± 1.67 6.82 ± 0.81 0.834
4s-IRP (mmHg) 33.68 ± 13.35 33.02 ± 14.59 0.875
Basal LES pressure (mmHg) 45.85 ± 11.46 40.16 ± 12.8 0.124
PEP (n/total swallows [%]) 43/133 (32.3) 35/85 (41.18) 0.365
Post-procedural parameters
4s-IRP (mmHg) 10.53 ± 3.84 12.71 ± 4.27 0.079
Basal LES pressure (mmHg) 11.98 ± 4.19 12.58 ± 4.83 0.652
PEP (n/total swallows [%]) 3/133 (2.26) 6/85 (7.06) 0.098
Symptom relapse 2 (6.67) 6 (35.26) 0.041

POEM, peroral endoscopic myotomy; PD, pneumatic dilatation; BMI, body mass index; 4s-IRP, 4-second integrated relaxation pressure; LES, lower esophageal sphincter; PEP, panesophageal pressurization.

Data are expressed as n/n, mean ± SD, or n (%).