Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 29;14(1):e14182. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202114182

Table 1.

Analysis of the molar mass distribution of ICs from AF4 data.

Sample Range of assigned molar masses (kDa) Mass‐weighted mean of assigned molar masses (kDa)
Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Mean ± SD
Infliximab, IFX 158–182 153–164 159–193 162 156 163 160 ± 4
TNF‐alpha 52–55 51–61 52–62 52 52 52 52 ± 0
ICs
IFX/TNF 3:1 182–1.16 × 103 164–1.11 × 103 193–1.10 × 103 409 398 518 442 ± 66
IFX/TNF 1:1 182–2.06 × 103 164–1.31 × 103 193–1.42 × 103 801 589 681 690 ± 106
IFX/TNF 1:3 182–5.05 × 103 164–6.89 × 103 193–10.8 × 103 1.77 × 103 2.00 × 103 2.61 × 103 2.13 × 103 ± 435
IFX/TNF 1:9 182–5.36 × 103 164–3.38 × 103 193–3.51 × 103 1.66 × 103 1.18 × 103 1.17 × 103 1.34 × 103 ± 279
IFX/TNF 1:27 182–1.68 × 103 164–768 193–1.01 × 103 689 464 521 558 ± 117

For a given elution time, the AF4 profiles provide the concentration (UV) at which a given molar mass (MALS) of a protein is present in the sample. The molar mass distribution of Ifx, TNF‐α and their immune complexes (sICs) was obtained by plotting the cumulative frequency as a function of molar mass. For a selected range of molar masses, a mass‐weighted mean value (<Mw>) was calculated. All detected molar masses were selected in the case of Ifx and TNF‐α whereas only molar masses larger than the maximal molar mass found for Ifx were assigned to sICs. The table shows the range of assigned molar masses and the calculated <Mw> for each AF4 run (n = 3).