Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 28;22(1):175. doi: 10.3390/s22010175

Table 8.

Performance comparison on three benchmark IQA databases.

Methods LIVE TID2013 LIVE-CH
SRCC PLCC SRCC PLCC SRCC PLCC
DIQaM [33] 0.960 0.972 0.835 0.855 0.606 0.601
BIECON [48] 0.958 0.960 0.717 0.762 0.595 0.613
DIQA [32] 0.975 0.977 0.825 0.850 0.703 0.704
DB-CNN [49] 0.968 0.971 0.816 0.865 0.851 0.869
AIGQA [16] 0.960 0.957 0.871 0.893 0.751 0.761
CNN-BQA (proposed) 0.961 0.966 0.881 0.876 0.772 0.786
DIIVINE [26] 0.925 0.923 0.654 0.549 0.546 0.568
BRISQUE [28] 0.939 0.942 0.573 0.651 0.607 0.585
ILNIQE [27] 0.902 0.865 0.519 0.640 0.430 0.510
FRIQUE [31] 0.948 0.962 0.669 0.704 0.720 0.720
SSEQ [30] 0.941 0.943 0.883 0.886 0.772 0.807
GMLOGQA [29] 0.956 0.970 0.883 0.877 0.782 0.805
DLBQA (proposed) 0.951 0.957 0.892 0.893 0.779 0.862
ILBQA (proposed) 0.977 0.983 0.934 0.942 0.876 0.883