Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 4;12(1):109. doi: 10.3390/ani12010109

Table 6.

Effects of the experimental diets on the relative abundance (%) of bacterial phyla 1.

Diet p-Value
W-SBM W-RSM R-SBM R-RSM SEM CER PM CER * PM
Jejunum 2
 Actinobacteria 0.550 5.40 1.36 2.72 0.673 0.467 0.019 0.177
 Bacteroidetes 0.064 3.11 0.089 0.174 0.686 0.292 0.258 0.284
 Firmicutes 98.4 a 88.7 b 98.2 a 96.7 a 1.1 0.039 0.004 0.032
 Proteobacteria 0.749 2.60 0.131 0.407 0.255 0.002 0.019 0.077
Colon ascendens
 Actinobacteria 0.344 2.61 1.44 3.00 0.435 0.380 0.029 0.678
 Bacteroidetes 17.5 23.4 18.2 26.1 1.4 0.540 0.014 0.713
 Firmicutes 80.0 72.3 79.1 68.2 1.7 0.423 0.005 0.607
 Proteobacteria 1.82 1.00 0.702 2.10 0.358 0.989 0.688 0.131
 Spirochaetes 0.202 0.082 0.350 0.133 0.044 0.245 0.053 0.569
Feces
 Actinobacteria 0.749 3.61 2.08 4.86 0.516 0.182 0.005 0.965
 Bacteroidetes 10.6 12.3 11.0 16.3 1.1 0.322 0.123 0.415
 Firmicutes 86.7 82.4 85.6 76.9 1.3 0.184 0.012 0.377
 Proteobacteria 0.961 1.19 0.247 1.35 0.221 0.533 0.137 0.323
 Spirochaetes 0.671 0.098 0.387 0.179 0.145 0.730 0.189 0.537
 Tenericutes 0.061 0.056 0.049 0.058 0.012 0.844 0.956 0.783

W-SBM, wheat/soybean meal; W-RSM, wheat/rapeseed meal; R-SBM, rye/soybean meal; R-RSM, rye/rapeseed meal; SEM, standard error of the mean; CER, cereal; PM, protein meal. 1 Data are presented as means (n = 11); p-values indicate effects of the factors cereal (CER), protein meal (PM) and their interaction (CER * PM). 2 W-RSM: n = 10 (DNA-extract not amplifiable). a, b Values within a row with different superscripts differ significantly at p ≤ 0.05 (Tukey test).