Table 5.
Associations between Perceived Positivity Resonance and Time Spent Interacting Face-to-Face, by Tele/Video Media, and by Computer-Mediated Communication (Within- and Between-person Effects) in Study 2 (highlighted) and Study 3
| Estimated within-person effect | Estimated between-person effect (i.e., person means) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B (SE) | 95% CI | Test statistic (t) | Variance explained | B (SE) | 95% CI | Test statistic (t) | Variance explained | |
| Model 1: Interacting (any type) | ||||||||
| Study 2 | 0.25 (0.04) | [0.16, 0.33] | 5.53,p < .001 | 8.03% | 0.32 (0.10) | [0.11, 0.53] | 3.07, p = .003 | 7.10% |
| Study 3 | 0.20 (0.02) | [0.15, 0.24] | 8.65, p < .001 | 5.54% | 0.20 (0.08) | [0.04, 0.35] | 2.50, p = .013 | 1.18% |
| Model 2: Face-to-face | ||||||||
| Study 2 | 0.16 (0.03) | [0.11, 0.22] | 5.57,p <.001 | 8.08% | 0.14 (0.06) | [0.02, 0.26] | 2.27, p = .025 | 2.78% |
| Study 3 | 0.21 (0.02) | [0.18, 0.24] | 13.68,p < 001 | 13.19% | 0.23 (0.06) | [0.11, 0.35] | 3.71,p < .001 | 3.02% |
| Model 3: Tele/video media | ||||||||
| Study 2 | 0.00 (0.03) | [−0.07, 0.07] | 0.01, p = .995 | 0.00% | 0.03 (0.09) | [−0.13, 0.20] | 0.40, p = .688 | 0.00% |
| Study 3 | −0.10 (0.03) | [−0.17, −0.04] | −3.09, p = .002 | 0.68% | −0.20 (0.13) | [−0.45, 0.06] | −1.52, p = .131 | 0.44% |
| Model 4: Computer-mediated | ||||||||
| Study 2 | −0.08 (0.04) | [−0.16, −0.01] | −2.23, p = .027 | 0.93% | −0.10 (0.09) | [−0.27, 0.07] | −1.15, p = .253 | 0.01% |
| Study 3 | −0.24 (0.03) | [−0.29, −0.19] | −9.26, p < .001 | 6.41% | −0.15 (0.10) | [−0.34, 0.05] | −1.46, p =.145 | 0.00% |
Note. Preliminary models allowed sample population (Study 2) or experimental condition (Study 3) to interact with predictors, but no main effect were statistically significant and fewer than 5% of interactions with condition (1 of 24 tests) were statistically significant (see Table E3 in the OSM). In Study 2, of the 120 total participants, three did not have any social episodes. Thus, the samples (person-level and episode-level) for this set of analyses are: Nparticipants = 117, Nsocial-episodes = 449. In Study 3, of the 172 total participants, one did not have any social episodes. Of the 1,443 episodes that contained a social interaction, 39 episodes contained missing data on one or more variables. Thus, the samples (person-level and episode-level) for this set of analyses are: Nparticipants = 171, Nsocial-episodes = 1,404.