Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 25;11(1):47. doi: 10.3390/foods11010047

Table 4.

Phenolic acid profile of I. paraquariensis and various varieties of I. aquifolium.

Compound RI Exp. 1 RI Lit. 2 m/z I. paraguariensis I. aquifolium I. aquifolium Alaska I. aquifolium Ferox Argentea
Concentration (mg/g) d.w.
Malic acid, 3TMS derivative 1502 1497 73/147/233 0.07 ± 0.02 3,4,a 0.55 ± 0.13 c 0.26 ± 0.09 b 0.26 ± 0.11 b
Citric acid, 4TMS derivative 1856 1845 273/73/147 0.16 ± 0.12 a 0.06 ± 0.02 c 0.11 ± 0.04 b 0.11 ± 0.05 b
Quininic acid, 5TMS derivative 1863 1851 373/374/377 0.01 ± 0.01 a 0.19 ± 0.07 b 0.22 ± 0.07 c 0.22 ± 0.11 c
Ferulic acid, 2TMS derivative 2102 2104 338/73/323 0.20 ± 0.08 a 0.11 ± 0.05 b 0.06 ± 0.02 c 0.06 ± 0.03 c
Caffeic acid, 3TMS derivative 2163 2155 396/219/73 2.43 ± 0.27 a 2.88 ± 0.43 c 1.68 ± 0.31 b 1.64 ± 0.24 b
3-O-Coumaroyl-D-quinic acid, 5TMS derivative 3043 3048 219/345/73 1.03 ± 0.09 a 0.07 ± 0.04 b 0.03 ± 0.02 c 0.04 ± 0.01 c
Chlorogenic acid, 6TMS derivative 3081 3092 345/73/255 1.08 ± 0.18 a 0.05 ± 0.02 b 0.03 ± 0.01 c 0.03 ± 0.01 c
4-O-Caffeoylquinic acid, 6TMS derivative 3096 3095 219/73/255 0.80 ± 0.13 a 0.04 ± 0.03 b 0.02 ± 0.01 c 0.02 ± 0.01 c
TOTAL 5.76 a 3.93 b 2.40 c 2.38 c

1 Experimental retention indices calculated against n-alkanes. 2 Retention indices according to the NIST 20 database. 3 Values are mean ± SEM; values followed by the same letter within a row are not significantly different (p > 0.05, Duncan’s test). 4 Data are relative concentrations expressed per internal standard.