Table 6.
Studies comparing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty
| Study | Design | Country | n (CDA/ACDF) | Age (years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porchet and Metcalf (2004)[41] | RCT | Switzerland | 27/28 | 44 |
| Mummaneni et al. (2007), Burkus et al. (2010, 2014), Gornet et al. (2019)[42,43,44,45] | RCT | USA | 275/265 | 43.5 |
| Nabhan et al. (2007, 2011)[46,47] | RCT | Germany | 20/21 | 44 |
| Murrey et al. (2008, 2009), Delamarter et al. (2010), Kelly et al. (2011), Kesman et al. (2012), Zigler et al. (2013), Zigler et al. (2013)[48,49,50,51,52,53,54] | RCT | USA | 103/106 | 42.5 |
| Sasso et al. (2007, 2008, 2011)[55,56,57] | RCT | USA | 242/241 | 44.7 |
| Riina et al. (2008)[58] | RCT | USA | 10/9 | 39 |
| Riew et al. (2008)[59] | RCT | USA | 59/52 | 45 |
| Heller et al. (2009)[60] | RCT | USA | 106/93 | 44.5 |
| Cheng et al. (2009, 2011)[61,62] | RCT | USA | 41/42 | 47.2 |
| Mcafee et al. (2010)[63] | RCT | USA | 151/100 | 44.5 |
| Coric et al. (2011)[64] | RCT | USA | 136/139 | 44 |
| Zhang et al. (2012)[65] | RCT | China | 60/60 | 44.8/45.6 |
| Vaccaro et al. (2013)[66] | RCT | USA | 236/144 | 44 |
| Davis et al. (2013, 2015)[67,68] | RCT | USA | 225/105 | 45.7 |
| Phillips et al. (2013, 2015)[69,70] | RCT | USA | 163/130 | 45.3/43.7 |
| Rozankovic et al. (2017)[71] | RCT | Croatia | 51/50 | 49 |
| Qizhi et al. (2016) [72] | RCT | China | 14/16 | 64.2 |
| Zhang et al. (2014)[73] | RCT | USA | 55/56 | 44.8 |
| Hisey et al. (2014, 2015)[74,75] | RCT | USA | 164/81 | 43.5 |
| Skeppholm (2015)[76] | RCT | Sweden | 73/80 | 42.2 |
| Jacksont et al. (2016)[77] | RCT | USA | 179/81 (single level), 231/105 (2 level) | - |
CDA – Cervical disc arthroplasty; ACDF – Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; RCT – Randomized controlled trials