Table 1.
Trial name | Year | Publication type | Surgical device used | Control arm | n | Mean follow‐up | Results | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary end point | Closure, % | Conclusions | |||||||
Johnson et al 1 | 2000 | Observational, retrospective | Excision | … | 437 | Technical feasibility and safety | 100 | Safe, suggested benefit in stroke prevention | |
Katz et al 25 | 2000 | Observational, retrospective | Endocardial suture | … | 50 | Evaluate postsurgical success with TEE at differed points in time | 64 | Incomplete LAA ligation occurred in 36% of patients irrespective of surgical technique | |
Garcia‐Fernandez et al 26 | 2003 | Observational, retrospective | Endocardial suture | … | 205 | Occurrence of embolic event | 90 | Positive stroke prevention | |
Bando et al 75 | 2003 | Observational, retrospective | Endocardial suture | … | 812 | Occurrence of embolic event | Negative for stroke prevention | ||
Blackshear et al 10 | 2003 | Observational, prospective | Thoracoscopic epicardial purse string | … | 15 | Feasibility of snare loop procedure and stroke incidence | 93 | Positive trend toward stroke prevention | |
Pennec et al 76 | 2003 | Observational, prospective series |
Endocardial suture Excision |
… | 30 | Safety and efficacy |
70–80 100 |
Negative for stroke prevention Negative outcomes in intra‐atrial approach Positive for stroke prevention |
|
Schneider et al 77 | 2005 | Observational, prospective series | Endocardial suture | … | 6 | Safety and efficacy | 17 | Incomplete surgical LAA closure may promote rather than reduce the risk of stroke; need for TEE to verify occlusion | |
Healey et al 24 | 2005 | Randomized controlled |
Epicardial suture Stapler |
No occlusion | 77 | 13 ± 7 mo | Safety and efficacy |
45 72 |
Safe at the time of CABG; positive for stroke prevention (2.6%) |
Kanderian et al 78 | 2008 | Observational, retrospective |
Excision (52) Suture exclusion (85) Stapler |
… | 137 | Comparison of effectiveness in surgical techniques |
73 23 20 |
There is a high occurrence of unsuccessful surgical LAA closure; of the various techniques, excision appears to be the most successful | |
Bakhtiary et al 79 | 2008 | Observational, prospective series | Clamp and epicardial suture | … | 259 | Safety, occurrence of stroke | 100 | Positive for stroke prevention | |
Ailawadi et al, EXCLUDE 28 | 2011 | Observational, prospective series | AtriClip | … | 75 | Safety and efficacy | 95 | Safe and stable on short‐term postprocedural imaging | |
Whitlock et al, LAAOS II 80 | 2013 | Cross‐sectional | Occlusion | No occlusion | 1889 | 1 y | Safety and efficacy | LAA occlusion can be safely performed at the time of cardiac surgery; positive for stroke prevention | |
Whitlock et al, LAAOS III 31 | 2021 | Randomized, controlled | Occlusion | No occlusion | 4811 | 3 y | Stroke or systemic embolism | LAA occlusion during cardiac surgery reduced risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation |
CABG indicates coronary artery bypass graft; EXCLUDE, The Exclusion of Left Atrial Appendage with AtriClip Exclusion Device in Patients Undergoing Concomitant Cardiac Surgery; LAA, left atrial appendage; LAAOS II, Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion During Cardiac Surgery to Prevent Stroke; LAAOS III, Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion During Cardiac Surgery to Prevent Stroke; and TEE, transesophageal echocardiogram.