Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 6;10(20):e021903. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021903

Table 2.

Outcomes of Subintimal and Intraluminal Approach After Matching

Subintimal approach Intraluminal approach P value
Endovascular treatment
Subintimal approach in successful wire crossing 47.5% (34.7%–60.2%) 2.2% (0.3%–4.1%) <0.001
Subintimal wire passage 61.0% (48.6%–73.5%) 36.3% (29.7%–42.9%) <0.001
Procedure time, min 82.9 (74.4–92.4) 78.6 (73.3–84.3) 0.54
Contrast volume, mL 82.6 (64.1–106.3) 88.3 (80.7–96.6) 0.86
Postoperative outcomes
Percentage of residual stenosis 8.5% (1.4%–15.6%) 6.3% (3.5%–9.1%) 0.79
Intravascular ultrasound‐derived minimum stent area, mm2 16.1 (14.5–17.6) 14.9 (14.2–15.6) 0.10
Ankle‐brachial index 0.90 (0.84–0.95) 0.90 (0.84–0.95) 0.96
Perioperative complications 9.5% (1.3%–17.7%) 5.6% (1.3%–9.8%) 0.47
1‐year clinical outcomes
Restenosis 41.0% (21.2%–60.9%) 43.4% (18.7%–68.1%) 0.40
All‐cause mortality 9.4% (1.2%–16.8%) 8.7% (0.3%–16.5%) 0.68
Major amputation 0.0% (0.0%–0.0%) 0.9% (0.0%–3.5%) 0.55
Major adverse limb events 19.1% (6.8%–29.7%) 15.0% (3.9%–24.7%) 0.83

Data are presented with estimates and 95% CIs.