Table 2. Input-oriented results, variation pre-post (%) in brackets.
In bold, the catchment areas directly involved with the decisional process.
| Areas | Relative technical efficiency (RTE) on average (1) | Probability of having an RTE score greater than 0.75(1) | RTE error | Stability of the ecosystem (4) (%) |
Shannon’s entropy (%) (5) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre (2) | Post (3) | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| Global (Gipuzkoa MH ecosystem) (6) | 0.83(7) | 0.86 (3.38) |
0.76 | 0.80 (4.85) |
0.0016 | 0.0019 (22.26) |
23.46 | 29.20 (24.47) |
76.69 | 71.18 (-7.18) |
| Alto Deba-Arrasate | 0.82 | 0.80 (-2.20) |
0.69 | 0.60 (-12.18) |
0.0068 | 0.0100 (47.02) |
28.71 | 22.93 (-20.11) |
66.07 | 74.20 (12.30) |
| Amara | 0.82 | 0.86 (5.01) |
0.63 | 0.77 (22.36) |
0.0042 | 0.0050 (19.74) |
29.71 | 36.12 (21.58) |
65.91 | 64.01 (-2.88) |
| Andoain | 0.95 |
0.96
(1.61) |
0.95 |
0.90
(-4.67) |
0.0014 |
0.0008
(-41.37) |
51.17 |
56.26
(9.96) |
47.55 |
42.46
(-10.71) |
| Azpeitia | 0.85 |
0.91
(7.79) |
0.83 |
0.91
(10.01) |
0.0049 |
0.0019
(-60.76) |
27.68 |
53.56
(93.50) |
67.57 |
56.39
(-16.54) |
| Beasain | 0.89 | 0.87 (-2.55) |
0.90 | 0.84 (-6.73) |
0.0021 | 0.0034 (62.42) |
40.97 | 40.02 (-2.32) |
58.53 | 67.89 (16.00) |
| Eguia | 0.74 | 0.83 (12.75) |
0.51 | 0.74 (44.78) |
0.0063 | 0.0031 (-51.33) |
27.98 | 28.33 (1.27) |
78.42 | 66.24 (-15.54) |
| Eibar | 0.77 | 0.78 (0.80) |
0.66 | 0.64 (-2.69) |
0.0042 | 0.0035 (-17.78) |
19.23 | 30.89 (60.63) |
78.26 | 73.29 (-6.34) |
| Irun | 0.73 | 0.78 (8.01) |
0.54 | 0.63 (16.75) |
0.0078 | 0.0049 (-37.66) |
26.22 | 29.38 (12.05) |
79.20 | 71.97 (-9.12) |
| Ondarreta | 0.81 | 0.83 (3.28) |
0.64 | 0.56 (-11.55) |
0.0056 | 0.0069 (22.68) |
30.90 | 29.97 (-3.03) |
74.22 | 57.82 (-22.10) |
| Renteria | 0.82 | 0.85 (3.82) |
0.73 | 0.80 (9.95) |
0.0049 | 0.0070 (41.56) |
32.24 | 36.93 (14.53) |
72.13 | 63.92 (-11.38) |
| Tolosa | 0.87 |
0.89
(1.58) |
0.87 |
0.83
(-3.70) |
0.0023 |
0.0055
(141.38) |
28.27 |
32.11
(13.58) |
72.20 |
70.60
(-2.21) |
| Zarautz | 0.86 | 0.88 (2.19) |
0.83 | 0.81 (-2.36) |
0.0026 | 0.0028 (10.81) |
37.05 | 44.25 (19.43) |
68.42 | 64.28 (-6.05) |
| Zumarraga | 0.86 | 0.90 (3.93) |
0.87 | 0.75 (-14.42) |
0.0035 | 0.0046 (32.49) |
28.43 | 39.09 (37.51) |
64.22 | 62.80 (-2.20) |
(1) RTE∈[0, 1] (0: DMU completely inefficient, 1: DMU completely efficient); 500 experiments.
(2) Pre: Pre-Intervention.
(3) Post: Post-Intervention.
(4) Stability∈[0. 100] (0: minimum stability–small data changes can result in very large RTE changes; 100 maximum stability–data changes do not modify RTE).
(5) Shannon´s entropy is calculated as a percentage of the feasible maximum estimated by the frequency analysis. Entropy∈[0, 100] (0: minimum–the ecosystem has a very homogeneous management, 100: maximum–the ecosystem has a very heterogeneous management).
(6) Fifteen scenarios (meaningful variable combinations (500 experiments each); 13 catchment areas.
(7) The results have been rounded to the most appropriate number of decimal places.