Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 11;11:e70017. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70017

Table 1. Cryo-EM data collection, refinement, and validation statistics.

Data collection and processing
Electron microscope Krios
Magnification 29,000
Number of micrographs 2055
Number of particles picked from good micrographs 162,713
Number of particles used in final reconstruction 141,549
Pixel size (Å) 0.822
Defocus range (μm) –0.2 to –1.5
Voltage (kV) 300
Electron dose (e-/Å2) 80
Map refinement
Model resolution (Å) 2.2
FSC threshold 0.143
Model resolution range (Å) 2.2–20
Map sharpening B-factor (Å2) –55.86
Refinement and model statistics
Clashscore, all atoms 2.23
Protein geometry
MolProbity score 1.29
Rotamer outliers (%) 0.92
Cβ deviations > 0.25 Å (%) 0.32
Ramachandran (%)
- Favored 95.79
- Allowed 4.01
- Outliers 0.2
Deviations from ideal geometry
- Bonds (%) 0.03
- Angles (%) 0.08
Nucleic acid geometry
Probably wrong sugar puckers (%) 0.84
Bad backbone conformations (%) 12.86
Bad bonds (%) 0.07
Bad angles (%) 0.08