Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 31;130:107175. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107175

Table 2.

Overview of results of the autoregressive latent variable model.

Predictorsa Bedtime news engagement (T2)
COVID-19 information FOMO (T2)
Daytime tiredness (T2)
b (SE), β p b (SE), β p b (SE), β p
Bedtime news engagement (T1) .35 (.05), .45 < .001 .08 (.03), .13 .016 -.02 (.05), −.02 .712
COVID-19 information FOMO (T1) .15 (.07), .12 .046 .51 (.06), .54 < .001 .18 (.09), .10 .043
Daytime tiredness (T1) .02 (.04), .02 .716 .03 (.03), .05 .405 .66 (.06), .66 < .001
Overall social media use (T1) .15 (.06), .14 .009 .07 (.04), .09 .097 .03 (.07), .02 .705
Perceived Stress (T1) -.001 (.06), −.002 .981 .01 (.05), .02 .776 -.04 (.08), −.04 .556
Age .002 (.004), .03 .610 .001 (.003), .02 .726 -.01 (.01), -.09 .038
Gender .002 (.10), .001 .982 -.11 (.07), −.07 .121 .10 (.12), .03 .389
Education: low vs. moderate -.13 (.13), −.06 .331 .05 (.10), .03 .600 .19 (.16), .06 .223
Education: low vs. high -.02 (.14), −.01 .886 .03 (.11), .02 .745 -.07 (.17), −.02 .679
Sample type -.53 (.11), -.24 < .001 .01 (.08), .004 .936 -.24 (.13), −.08 .072

Notes: T1 = Measurement time 1 (i.e., April 2020), T2 = Measurement time 2 (i.e., May 2020). Significant findings are in bold. Sample types were coded: 0 = polling quota sample data, 1 = university quota-sample data. Self-identified gender are coded: 0 = male, 1 = female).

a

NT1 = 731, NT2 = 416.