Table 2.
Mann–Whitney U test results between intervention group (n = 34) and control group (n = 34).
| Mann–Whitney U test results between intervention group (n = 34) and control group (n = 35) (intergroup analysis at different time points for primary and secondary outcomes) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Baseline (T1)–Week 4 (T2) | Week 4 (T2)–Week 8 (T3) | Week 8 (T3)–Week 12 (T4) | ||||||||||
| Intervention (n = 35) | Control group (n = 33) | Test stats (Mann–Whitney U) | p value | Intervention (n = 35) | Control group (n = 33) | Test stats (Mann–Whitney U) | p value | Intervention (n = 35) | Control group (n = 33) | Test stats (Mann–Whitney U) | p value | ||
| MBI-Exhaustion | −1.0 (−4.0; 2.0) | −1.0 (−3.0; 1.0) | 597.5 | 0.81 | −1.5 (−5.3; 1.0) | −1.0 (−3.3; 0.0) | 558.5 | 0.89 | −1.5 (−5.3; 1.0) | (−2.3; 2.0) | 669.0 | 0.17 | |
| MBI-Cynicism | −0.3 (−0.9; 0.4) | −0.2 (−1.0; 0.3) | 617.0 | 0.67 | (3.3; 3.3) | −0.5 (−4.0; 3.0) | 512.5 | 0.74 | (−3.3; 3.3) | (−0.4; 3.0) | 541.0 | 0.93 | |
| MBI-Professional Efficiency | 0.5 (−2.0; 5.3) | 0.0 (−2.0; 2.0) | 530.5 | 0.55 | (−3.0; 2.0) | (−5.3; 4.0) | 593.0 | 0.66 | (−3.0; 2.0) | (−3.0; 3.3) | 586.5 | 0.73 | |
| PSS | −3.0 (−8.0; 0.0) | −1.5 (−4.0; 1.0) | 703.0 | 0.19 | −1.0 (−3.0; 2.0) | −2.5 (−6.0; 4.0) | 488.0 | 0.27 | −1.0 (−3.0; 2.0) | (−2.0; 3.0) | 628.0 | 0.44 | |
| MAAS | 0.3 (−0.1; 0.9) | 0.4 (−0.1; 0.8) | 587.5 | 0.93 | (−0.4; 0.4) | 0.1 (−0.2; 0.5) | 675.0 | 0.28 | (−0.4; 0.4) | (−0.2; 0.6) | 697.0 | 0.17 | |
| DPES | 0.3 (0.0; −0.8) | 0.1 (−0.5; 0.7) | 492.0 | 0.22 | (−0.3; 0.8) | (−0.5; 0.7) | 561.0 | 0.88 | (−0.3; 0.8) | −0.2 (−0.8; 0.4) | 469.0 | 0.17 | |
| CES-D | −1.0 (−5.0; 0.0) | −1.5 (−5.0; 3.0) | 617.0 | 0.79 | (−2.0; 4.0) | (−3.0; 2.0) | 517.0 | 0.50 | (−2.0; 4.0) | (−3.3; 2.3) | 506.0 | 0.38 | |
| Anxiety | −3.0 (−7.0; 0.0) | −2.0 (−5.0; 0.0) | 670.0 | 0.37 | (−1.0; 3.0) | −0.5 (−4.0; 1.0) | 405.5 | 0.03 | (−1.0; 3.0) | (−1.0; 1.0) | 544.0 | 0.72 | |