TABLE 5.
Examples of the analysis when the biochemical results for strains 1 and 2 were run in a revised version of the program GEORGE (version 99B) after Enteric Group 137 had been added to the databasea
| Strain | Program choice | Identification score
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw | Normalized | ||
| 1 | Enteric Group 137 | 0.058847 | 0.999971 |
| K. cryocrescens | 0.000001 | 0.000025 | |
| Y. intermedia | 0.00000026 | 0.000004 | |
| 2 | Enteric Group 137 | 0.058847 | 0.999996 |
| C. farmeri | 0.00000023 | 0.000004 | |
| K. cryocrescens | 0.000000015 | 0.25 × 10−6 | |
a
Only the first set of identification scores is given (out of 12 actually done), but it is the most important. No tests were incompatible with Enteric Group 137 for either strain.