Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 12;92(4):1168–1174. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01916-6

Table 1.

Demographics, key predictors, and outcome by age and cumulative risk.

Variable Preschool children Siga School-age children Siga
All Low risk High risk All Low risk High risk
Sample size 789 487 302 391 266 125
Cumulative risk (%)
   Child minority (yes) 31.56 10.68 65.23 265.29*** 27.88 10.53 64.80 132.02***
   Mom age at birth (≤18) 1.15 0.21 2.68 10.00** 0.77 0.38 1.60 1.67
   Single parent (yes) 17.36 2.05 42.05 207.85*** 16.62 3.76 44.00 99.35***
   Mom’s education (<HS) 7.48 1.44 17.22 67.10*** 7.16 1.13 20.00 45.56***
   Income-to-needs (<1.85) 35.36 11.70 73.51 311.53*** 27.88 6.77 72.80 184.42***
   More than 3 siblings (yes) 14.70 12.32 18.54 5.76* 13.81 12.41 16.80 1.38
   All background TV (h, SE) 3.85 3.01 5.20 116.79*** 2.70 2.34 3.48 49.24***
Primary activity during background TV (min, SE)
   Socializing with family 6.09 (1.22) 6.37 (1.46) 5.70 (2.09) −0.26 4.93 (2.29) 5.97 (3.42) 3.43 (2.67) −0.57
   Playing alone 53.71 (5.93) 51.88 (6.33) 56.35 (11.24) 0.35 21.21 (4.60) 22.31 (5.29) 19.63 (8.36) −0.26
   Playing with others 11.24 (2.73) 11.69 (3.32) 10.60 (4.64) −0.19 4.38 (1.58) 5.93 (2.52) 2.15 (1.29) −1.38
   Academic or enrichment 5.88 (1.51) 8.01 (2.50) 2.81 (0.75) −2.55* 6.54 (1.91) 7.72 (2.31) 4.85 (3.25) −0.63
   Routines/chores 27.97 (4.13) 20.35 (3.24) 38.96 (8.94) 2.33* 25.47 (4.88) 32.14 (7.79) 15.86 (3.95) −2.03*
   Eating/drinking 22.41 (2.49) 20.67 (3.48) 24.92 (3.44) 0.86 13.07 (2.16) 11.73 (2.58) 15.01 (3.73) 0.74
   Sleeping 104.47 (11.68) 81.94 (13.64) 136.97 (20.66) 2.29* 74.37 (14.04) 55.38 (12.92) 101.77 (28.78) 1.66
Outcome
   Executive function (EF, SD) 49.99 (9.98) 48.84 (8.62) 51.86 (11.62) 17.44*** 49.98 (10.00) 48.17 (8.34) 53.85 (11.99) 29.41***

aΧ2 tests were computed to test for significant differences by risk status for all demographic variables included in the cumulative risk variable. Poisson regressions were computed in Stata 14.2 for all categories of background TV exposure due to substantially non-normal distributions. The margins command was used to calculate the means for each category. One-way ANOVAs were computed to test for EF differences by risk status.

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.