Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 11;42(1):BSR20211972. doi: 10.1042/BSR20211972

Table 6. Summary of association results of included studies.

Association result Gleason (n=28)* Stage (n=18) PSA (n=18)*
P<0.05 Pos T Arisan, 2020; Guan, 2016; Li, 2012; Melbø-Jørgensen, 2014; Zhao, 2019a Li, 2012; Melbø-Jørgensen, 2014; Reis, 2012; Zhao, 2019a
C Al-Qatati, 2017; Gurbuz, 2020; Ibrahim, 2019a; Ibrahim, 2019b; Ju, 2019; Yang, 2016 Al-Qatati, 2017; Gurbuz, 2020; Huang, 2015b; Ibrahim, 2019a; Ibrahim, 2019b; Ju, 2019; Stuopelyte, 2016; Yang, 2016 Al-Qatati, 2017; Gurbuz, 2020; Ibrahim, 2019b
U Samaan, 2014
Neg T Ren, 2014 Ren, 2014
P >0.05 Pos T Katz, 2014; Kurul, 2019; Lichner, 2015; Reis, 2012; Zedan, 2017; Zedan, 2018 Zedan, 2017 Li, 2012; Reis, 2012; Zedan, 2018; Zhao, 2019a
C Shen, 2012 Shen, 2012
Zedan, 2019
Ju, 2019; Shen, 2012; Zedan, 2018; Zedan, 2019
Neg T Kristensen, 2016** Katz, 2014 Zedan, 2017
C Kotb, 2014; Zedan, 2018; Zedan, 2019 Sharova, 2021; Yang, 2016; Zhao, 2019b
No diff T Amankwah, 2013 Guan, 2016; Katz, 2014
C Farran, 2018; Foj, 2017; Stuopelyte, 2016
No
P-value
Pos T Hart, 2014
No corr C Agaoglu, 2011
Association result Recurrence (n=19) Metastasis (n=14) Risk (n=12) Age (n=9)
P<0.05 Pos T Leite, 2015; Li, 2012; Melbø-Jørgensen, 2014; Reis, 2012 Guan, 2016; Li, 2012 Zhu, 2019
C Huang, 2015b; Ju, 2019; Yang, 2016 Agaoglu, 2011; Brase, 2011; Huang, 2015b; Ibrahim, 2019a; Ibrahim, 2019b; Watahiki, 2013; Yang, 2016; Ju, 2019 Foj, 2017; Ju, 2019; Shen, 2012 Zedan, 2019
Neg T Suer, 2019**; Amankwah, 2013 Ren, 2014 Ren, 2014
C Danarto, 2020
P>0.05 Pos T Kurul, 2019; Leite, 2011; Ren, 2014 Katz, 2014; Leite, 2013; Zedan, 2017
C Stuopelyte, 2016 Al-Qatati, 2017; Hoey, 2019; Sapre, 2014; Zedan, 2019 Huang, 2015b; Yang, 2016
Neg T Katz, 2014 Leite, 2011 Lichner, 2013 Zhao, 2019a; Li, 2012
C Selth, 2013; Shen, 2012 Shen, 2012; Zhao, 2019b
No diff/corr T Kristensen, 2016**; Zheng, 2014 Guan, 2016
C Singh, 2014
No
P-value
Pos T Bonci, 2016

Most of the 64 studies included in this review compared the association of miR-21 with commonly used clinicopathological prognostic factors (Gleason score/grade; pathological/clinical stage; serum PSA level; risk stratification; age at diagnosis), as well as recurrence and metastasis.

Study IDs in bold were eligible for meta-analysis (n=11).

Possible part overlap of participants between Ibrahim, 2019a [48] and Ibrahim, 2019b [49].

Abbreviations: C, circulating miR-21; corr, correlation; diff, difference; Neg, negative association; Pos, positive association; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; T, tissue miR-21; U, unknown miR-21 source

*

Zedan, 2018 [86] was counted twice as both tissue and plasma miR-21 expressions were measured.

**

3p strand of miR-21 was measured.