Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 10;29(1):e100459. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100459

Table 1.

Key dimension of fairness in the literature review by discipline (n=213)

Research field Fairness dimension Specific attribute Volume of articles by specific attributes
Computational sciences
(n=68)
Transparency


Impartiality


Inclusion
Interpretability/explainability
Accountability
Provenance
Implementation
Completeness
Patient and family engagement
+ + +
+
+ + + +
+
+ + +
+
Medicine
(n=43)
Transparency


Impartiality


Inclusion
Interpretability/explainability
Accountability
Provenance
Implementation
Completeness
Patient and family engagement
+
+ + +
+ +
+ + + +
+ + +
+ +
Social sciences
(n=73)
Transparency


Impartiality


Inclusion
Interpretability/explainability
Accountability
Provenance
Implementation
Completeness
Patient and family engagement
+ + +
+ + + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ +
Interdisciplinary research teams
(n=29)
Transparency


Impartiality


Inclusion
Interpretability/explainability
Accountability
Provenance
Implementation
Completeness
Patient and family engagement
+ +
+ +
+ + +
+ + + +
+ +
+

++++The majority of the literature reviewed in this field.

+++Several peer reviewed articles (five or more).

++A small number of peer reviewed articles (less than five).

+Little or no known literature (two or less).