Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2013 Mar 15;76:236–251. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.066

Table 1.

Within-subject reliability statistics for the Reference Sample ICNs at the voxel-level for the full ICN

ICNS IN ANALYSIS VOXEL-LEVEL STATISTICS
REF ICNs xyz of maximum ICC voxel in full ICN maximum ICC value in full ICN 75th percentile ICC value in full ICN 50th percentile ICC value in full ICN 25th percentile ICC value in full ICN
Emotion-Reward 1 (16) 63 74 33 0.85 0.43 0.32 0.20
Reward 2-Emo/Exec (00) 47 89 41 0.78 0.38 0.25 0.10
Interoception/Autonomic (04) 49 56 15 0.82 0.45 0.33 0.19
Visuospatial (10) 66 62 52 0.94 0.60 0.47 0.32
Arm/Hand (11) 22 48 69 0.94 0.46 0.34 0.19
Coordination (07) 31 46 62 0.85 0.51 0.41 0.30
Vision (01) 29 16 48 0.91 0.48 0.38 0.27
Social Cog/Default Mode (08) 42 34 40 0.89 0.55 0.45 0.34
Frontal-Temporal (12) 22 49 38 0.86 0.44 0.31 0.16
Right-Executive (03) 30 76 62 0.93 0.66 0.55 0.43
Audition/Speech (06) 11 57 50 0.91 0.56 0.42 0.27
Left-Executive (05) 56 79 62 0.93 0.59 0.48 0.36

ICN, Intrinsic Connectivity Network; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; REF, Reference Sample; xyz, voxel coordinates in standard space. Voxel-level ICC statistics were derived after generating whole-brain voxel-wise ICC maps for each group-level Reference Sample ICN. An ICC lower than 0.40 is considered ‘poor’, 0.40 – 0.58 is considered a ‘fair’ level of agreement, 0.59 – 0.75 is considered ‘good’ agreement, 0.76 and above is considered ‘excellent’ agreement (Cicchetti & Sparrow, 1981). Bold values indicate statistic greater than or equal to 0.40.