Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 12;22:21. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01559-4

Table 1.

Patient characteristics by gastric antrum grade

Perlas grading Study object
(N total = 117)
p
Grade 0 (n = 40) Grade 1 (n = 68) Grade 2 (n = 9)
Male:female 8/32 28/40 6/3 42/75 0.01
Age 43.2 (31.3–55.0) 40.9 (28.0–50.0) 40.2 (25.5–56.0) 41.6 (29.5–54.0) 0.65
BMI (kg/m) 22.3 (20.0–24.1) 22.3 (20.1–24.2) 22.8 (19.7–26.5) 22.3 (20.1–24.2) 0.81
Weight (kg) 58.4 (50.5–64.5) 61.3 (53.0–67.8) 64.4 (54.0–71.5) 60.6 (52.5–66.0) 0.23
Reflux Oesophagitis 5 (12.5%) 4 (5.9%) 0 (0.0%) 9 (7.7%) 0.11
Gastric ulcer 2 (5.0%) 12 (17.6%) 4 (44.4%) 18 (15.4%) < 0.01
Gastric mucosal erosion 18 (45.0%) 18 (26.5%) 0 (0.0%) 36 (30.8%) 0.03
FD 15(37.5%) 34(50.0%) 5(55.6%) 54(46.2%) 0.17

Data represent n (%), ratio, or median and interquartile ranges (IQR 25–75%), BMI body mass index, FD functional dyspepsia