Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 12;56(2):133–140. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001491

TABLE 2.

All-cause HCRU in Patients With EoE and Matched Controls During Follow-up

HCRU Patients With EoE (n=16,094) [A] Matched Controls (n=16,094) [B] Unadjusted OR* (95% CI) P Adjusted OR (95% CI) P [A] vs. [B]
Diagnostic endoscopies, n (%) 11,890 (73.9) 278 (1.7) 160.9 (142.2-182.1) <0.0001 184.3 (160.4-211.7) <0.0001
Inpatient admissions, n (%) 1107 (6.9) 605 (3.8) 1.9 (1.7-2.1) <0.0001 1.5 (1.3-1.7) <0.0001
ER visits
 Any visit, n (%) 4211 (26.2) 2069 (12.9) 2.4 (2.3-2.6) <0.0001 2.2 (2.0-2.3) <0.0001
  Food impaction 1083 (6.7) 7 (0.04) 165.8 (78.8-348.7) <0.0001 <0.0001
  Esophageal stricture 510 (3.2) 1 (0.006) 526.7 (74.0-3746.4) <0.0001 <0.0001
  Asthma 403 (2.5) 124 (0.8) 3.3 (2.7-4.1) <0.0001 2.1 (1.7-2.7) <0.0001
  Food allergy 81 (0.5) 12 (0.1) 6.8 (3.7-12.4) <0.0001 4.9 (2.5-9.5) <0.0001
  Dysphagia 77 (0.5) 0 (0.0) 77.4 (10.8-556.3) <0.0001 <0.0001
  GERD 509 (3.2) 54 (0.3) 9.7 (7.3-12.9) <0.0001 5.8 (4.1-8.2) <0.0001
Outpatient visits
 Any visit, n (%) 16,042 (99.7) 13,810 (85.8) 51.0 (38.7-67.2) <0.0001 24.2 (18.3-32.1) <0.0001
  Gastroenterologist 10,838 (67.3) 723 (4.5) 43.8 (40.4-47.6) <0.0001 35.6 (32.5-38.9) <0.0001
  Allergist 6226 (38.7) 534 (3.3) 18.4 (16.8-20.2) <0.0001 14.9 (13.5-16.4) <0.0001
  Pulmonary specialist 511 (3.2) 291 (1.8) 1.8 (1.5-2.1) <0.0001 1.1 (1.0-1.4) 0.1592
  Psychologist 586 (3.6) 286 (1.8) 2.1 (1.8-2.4) <0.0001 1.5 (1.3-1.8) <0.0001
*

Unadjusted ORs were evaluated for binary variables (ie, at least 1 visit). ORs for ER visits associated with dysphagia assume 1 event for matched controls.

P-values were calculated using McNemar’s test or the exact McNemar’s test for binary variables. A P-value <0.05 was statistically significant.

Adjusted ORs were evaluated for binary variables using logistic regression controlling for index year, health plan at index date, comorbidities (GERD and atopic disease), prior treatment (medication for GERD and asthma) and HCRU (inpatient, outpatient, and ER) during the preindex period. A generalized estimating equation was used to control for correlation between pairs. The adjusted models for ER visits associated with dysphagia, esophageal stricture, and food impaction did not converge owing to low numbers of events.

CI indicates confidence interval; EoE, eosinophilic esophagitis; ER, emergency room; GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease; HCRU, health care resource use; OR, odds ratio.