Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 12;10(1):e01564-21. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01564-21

TABLE 2.

SARS-CoV-2 serology assay evaluations grouped by assay type and target antigen

Evaluationsa Lateral flow ELISA CIAb
Antibody Type
 IgG 75 4 2
 IgM 72 2 0
 Pan-Ig 1 3 1
 IgM/IgA 1 0 0
 IgM/IgG 2 0 0
 IgA 0 1 0
Target antigens
 Spike 11 5 1
 Nucleocapsid 3 0 2
 Spike and nucleocapsid 7 1 0
 Unknown 57 4 0
a

91 total evaluations. Four assays (Zhuhai Livzon Diagnostics Inc. Livzon IgM/IgG Diagnostic kit for IgM/IgG Antibody to Coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) Lateral Flow; BTNX Inc. COVID-19 IgG/IgM Test Cassettes; Nirmidas Biotech, Inc. COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) IgM/IgG Antibody Detection kit; and Jiangsu Well Biotech Co., Ltd. COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Test) were evaluated twice on two separate panels with either the same lot number of assays (n = 3) or a different lot number of the assay (n = 1). These assays were evaluated twice because they represented cases where PPA or NPA were below the recommended performance threshold.

b

Automated chemiluminescent immunoassays (CIA) is a general term used to describe a variety of automated clinical immunoassays, such as Abbott, Architect i1000 SARS-CoV-2 IgG; Roche Diagnostic Corporation, Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2; and Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc., VITROS Immunodiagnostic Products Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Reagent Pack.