Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 10;114(1):60–67. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab187

Table 3.

Trial- and individual patient–level surrogacy

True endpoint No. of comparison units (No. of patientsa) RWLS2 (95% CI) RCopula2 (95% CI) ρCopula (95% CI) STE (HR)
All trials included
 5-y OS 14 (19 279) 0.82 (0.67 to 0.98) 0.92 (0.83 to 1.00) 0.90 (0.90 to 0.91) 0.79
 6-y OS 13 (17 020) 0.88 (0.70 to 1.00) 0.97 (0.93 to 1.00) 0.91 (0.90 to 0.91) 0.80
 6.5-y OS 10 (11 382) 0.94 (0.81 to 1.00) 0.99 (0.97 to 1.00) 0.91 (0.90 to 0.91) 0.80
Excluding 1 small comparison (n < 100)
 5-y OS 13 (19 181) 0.79 (0.58 to 1.00) 0.74 (0.49 to 0.98) 0.90 (0.90 to 0.91)
 6-y OS 12 (16 922) 0.86 (0.60 to 1.00) 0.89 (0.78 to 1.00) 0.91 (0.90 to 0.91)
 6.5-y OS 9 (11 284) 0.93 (0.67 to 1.00) 0.97 (0.94 to 1.00) 0.91 (0.90 to 0.91)
a

AVANT (14) trial included 2 experimental arms. The control arm patients (n = 901) were duplicated for surrogacy analyses. HR = hazard ratio; OS = overall survival; ρCopula = rank correlation coefficient; STE = surrogate threshold effect; WLS = weighted least squares.