Table 3.
Body weight and average daily gain in pigs fed diets differing in fibre content and viscosity*
| Fibre content | MSBM | DDGS | SEM | P † | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viscosity | CEL | MCMC | HCMC | CEL | MCMC | HCMC | F | V | F × V | Linear | Quadratic | |
| Initial BW, kg | 26·68 | 26·16 | 26·40 | 26·33 | 26·78 | 26·92 | 1·73 | 0·46 | 0·08 | 0·47 | NA | NA |
| Final BW, kg | 56·44a | 48·67b | 49·29b | 56·34a | 48·29b | 52·30b | 2·45 | 0·38 | 0·0004 | 0·59 | 0·0006 | 0·01 |
| ADG, kg | 0·84a | 0·61b | 0·64b | 0·83a | 0·62b | 0·70b | 0·04 | 0·50 | 0·0002 | 0·68 | 0·0003 | 0·01 |
a,b Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0.05).
Two basal diets: maize–soyabean meal (MSBM) or MSBM plus 30 % distillers dried grains with solubles (MSBM + DDGS) with three levels of viscosity (i.e. CEL, non-viscous cellulose; MCMC, medium-viscous carboxymethylcellulose; HCMC, high-viscous carboxymethylcellulose).
Factorial arrangement of treatments fibre (F) and viscosity (V) main effects with eighteen and twelve observations, respectively, and fibre and viscosity interaction (F × V) with six observations per treatment. Polynomial (linear and quadratic) contrasts were used to determine the effect of viscosity.