Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 12;127(2):177–187. doi: 10.1017/S0007114521000866

Table 3.

Body weight and average daily gain in pigs fed diets differing in fibre content and viscosity*

Fibre content MSBM DDGS SEM P
Viscosity CEL MCMC HCMC CEL MCMC HCMC F V F × V Linear Quadratic
Initial BW, kg 26·68 26·16 26·40 26·33 26·78 26·92 1·73 0·46 0·08 0·47 NA NA
Final BW, kg 56·44a 48·67b 49·29b 56·34a 48·29b 52·30b 2·45 0·38 0·0004 0·59 0·0006 0·01
ADG, kg 0·84a 0·61b 0·64b 0·83a 0·62b 0·70b 0·04 0·50 0·0002 0·68 0·0003 0·01

a,b Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0.05).

*

Two basal diets: maize–soyabean meal (MSBM) or MSBM plus 30 % distillers dried grains with solubles (MSBM + DDGS) with three levels of viscosity (i.e. CEL, non-viscous cellulose; MCMC, medium-viscous carboxymethylcellulose; HCMC, high-viscous carboxymethylcellulose).

Factorial arrangement of treatments fibre (F) and viscosity (V) main effects with eighteen and twelve observations, respectively, and fibre and viscosity interaction (F × V) with six observations per treatment. Polynomial (linear and quadratic) contrasts were used to determine the effect of viscosity.