Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 12;127(2):177–187. doi: 10.1017/S0007114521000866

Table 4.

Intestinal morphology and goblet cell area in pigs fed diets differing in fibre content and viscosity*

Fibre content MSBM DDGS SEM P
Viscosity CEL MCMC HCMC CEL MCMC HCMC F V F × V
Jejunum
  Villus height, µm 312·76 326·73 384·02 333·06 340·53 375·32 24·73 0·68 0·06 0·82
  Crypt depth, µm 99·51b 99·73b 127·09a 109·99b 101·16b 127·85a 9·64 0·60 0·02 0·86
  Villus:crypt ratio 3·37 3·44 3·25 3·24 3·50 3·19 0·13 0·84 0·66 0·94
  Goblet cell area, %§ 3·55 4·17 4·03 3·39 3·49 3·88 0·52 0·45 0·64 0·85
Ileum
  Villus height, µm 307·69 333·29 376·50 351·26 358·18 367·81 20·93 0·25 0·12 0·42
  Crypt depth, µm 209·44 257·15 267·66 238·24 250·60 244·11 17·47 0·97 0·09 0·23
  Villus:crypt ratio 1·53 1·34 1·47 1·54 1·49 1·55 0·08 0·23 0·35 0·69
  Goblet cell area, %§ 7·59b 12·84a 12·26a 8·08b 11·02a 11·68a 1·22 0·53 0·004 0·66

a,b Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0.05).

*

Two basal diets: maize–soyabean meal (MSBM) or MSBM plus 30 % distillers dried grains with solubles (MSBM + DDGS) with three levels of viscosity (i.e. CEL, non-viscous cellulose; MCMC, medium-viscous carboxymethylcellulose; HCMC, high-viscous carboxymethylcellulose).

Standard error of the mean.

Factorial arrangement of treatments fibre (F), viscosity (V) main effects with eighteen and twelve, observations respectively, and fibre and viscosity interaction (F × V) with six observations per treatment.

§

Goblet cells area was defined as area of positive cells for PAS-AB staining/mucosal area × 100.