Skip to main content
. 2014 May 28;2014(5):CD003895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003895.pub3

Coyne 2000.

Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Study duration: NS

  • Duration of follow‐up: 20 weeks

Participants
  • Country: USA

  • Setting: multicentre

  • Dialysis patients; no rHuEPO in previous 12 weeks; baseline Hb ≤ 10.0 g/dL

  • Number: treatment group 1 (90); treatment group 2 (31)

  • Mean age ± SD (years): NS

  • M/F: NS

  • Exclusion criteria: NS

Interventions Treatment group 1
  • DA: 0.45 µg/kg IV or SC once/wk, continued for 20 weeks


Treatment group 2
  • rHuEPO: 50 U/kg 3 times/wk (150 U/kg/wk), continued for 20 weeks


Other information
  • Dose adjustments made as necessary to achieve target Hb


Co‐interventions
  • NS

Outcomes
  • % achieving target Hb

  • Adverse events

Notes
  • Loss to follow‐up: no information about any losses to follow‐up or patients excluded from analyses

  • Additional data requested from author and information on randomisation was obtained

  • Abstract only

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "Randomization was centrally performed using an IVRS system" (information from author)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "Randomization was centrally performed using an IVRS system" (information from author)
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Primary outcome was laboratory based and not likely to be influenced by blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Primary outcome was laboratory based and not likely to be influenced by blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk NR; data provided as % and unclear whether all patients completed study
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Abstract only, not all results available
Other bias Unclear risk NS