Frifelt 1996.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group 1
Treatment group 2
Other information
Co‐interventions
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "randomised, prospective study" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not mentioned |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Primary outcome was laboratory based and not likely to be influenced by blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Primary outcome was laboratory based and not likely to be influenced by blinding |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 15% (6/39) excluded and missing data could have influenced final result; peritonitis (4); cerebral ischaemia (1); death due to AMI (1) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | No reports on mortality and incomplete reporting of adverse effects. Results available only as median and IQR and cannot be entered in meta‐analyses |
Other bias | High risk | Funded study by Ercopharm, Kvistgaard, Denmark |