Skip to main content
. 2014 May 28;2014(5):CD003895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003895.pub3

RUBRA Study 2008.

Methods
  • Study design: parallel group, open‐label RCT

  • Time frame: NS

  • Duration of study: 36 weeks; evaluation 29 to 36 weeks

Participants
  • Country: international

  • Setting: multicentre

  • Aged ≥ 18 years; HD or PD ≥ 12 weeks; stable on EPO ≥ 8 weeks; baseline Hb 10.5 to 13.0 g/dL; adequate iron stores, serum ferritin ≥100 ng/mL or TSAT ≥ 20%

  • Number: treatment group 1 (104); treatment group 2 (168)

  • Mean age ± SD (years): treatment group 1 (59.8 ± 14.4); treatment group 2 (60.1 ± 13.9)

  • Sex (M/F): treatment group 1 (104/64); treatment group 2 (113/55)

  • Exclusion criteria: blood transfusions < 8 weeks; GI bleeding; non‐renal causes of anaemia; CAD; liver disease; uncontrolled hypertension

Interventions Treatment group 1
  • CERA: SC or IV every two weeks

  • Initial dose based on EPO dose received during week preceding randomisation. Patients receiving weekly EPO > 8000, 8000 to 16,000 or > 16,000 IU were administered a starting CERA twice weekly dose of 60, 100 or 180 μg respectively


Treatment group 2
  • EPO: continued, once/wk or 3 times/wk SC/IV


Other information
  • Dose adjustments were permitted for safety at any point during the study to maintain individual's Hb within 1g/dL of baseline value and within 10.0 to 13.5 g/dL. For CERA dose adjustment was not permitted more frequently than once every 4 weeks


Co‐interventions
  • Iron supplementation was performed according to individual centre practice

Outcomes
  • Final Hb

  • Number reaching target Hb

  • Median dose of ESA

  • Adverse events

Notes
  • Information on sequence generation and allocation concealment requested from authors: no information received

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk NS
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Stratified by geographical region and route of administration
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No blinding but outcome of Hb unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No blinding but outcome of Hb unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All patients accounted; 54/282 (19%) withdrew due to AEs (4), death (16), transplantation (16), insufficient therapeutic response (1), refusal of treatment (1), failure to return (1), other (12)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk All important outcomes provided. ITT data only available graphically and PP data entered in meta‐analyses
Other bias High risk Funded by Roche