RUBRA Study 2008.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group 1
Treatment group 2
Other information
Co‐interventions
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | NS |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Stratified by geographical region and route of administration |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No blinding but outcome of Hb unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No blinding but outcome of Hb unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All patients accounted; 54/282 (19%) withdrew due to AEs (4), death (16), transplantation (16), insufficient therapeutic response (1), refusal of treatment (1), failure to return (1), other (12) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | All important outcomes provided. ITT data only available graphically and PP data entered in meta‐analyses |
Other bias | High risk | Funded by Roche |