Skip to main content
. 2014 May 28;2014(5):CD003895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003895.pub3
Study Reason for exclusion
Allon 2002 Pharmacokinetic study
BA16260 Study 2006 Dose finding study
Bennett 1991 Participants not on dialysis
Besarab 1998 Haematocrit target study
Bhuiyan 2004 Dose varied, not frequency
Brandt 1999 Dose varied, not frequency
Brown 1988 Haematocrit target study
Canadian EPO Study 1990 Injection frequency was not randomised; participants were randomised to placebo (Group 1) and two groups maintaining Hb from 95 to 110 g/L (Group 2) or 115 to 130 g/L (Group 3)
Castro 1994 Unclear how patients were allocated to groups; no reply from study author
Chazot 2009 Dose study
Dougherty 2004 Dose dependent study not on dialysis
Fan 1992 Unclear how patients were allocated to groups, wrote to authors, no response
Hirakata 2010 Participants not on dialysis
Icardi 1990 Different routes of administration (not frequency)
Ifudu 1998 No control group, no change in frequency
Iwasaki 2008 Examined conversion ratios for EPO to darbepoetin
Kawanishi 2005 Dose escalation study
Kim 2009a Compared different routes of administration
Knebel 2008 Pharmacokinetic study
Locatelli 2008 Control group received either weekly darbepoetin or rHuEPO 2 to 3 times weekly; numbers receiving each control intervention could not be separated.
Macdougall 2003 Dose escalation study
Macdougall 2006 Participants not on dialysis
Macdougall 2007a Study terminated by sponsor for commercial reasons. No results available
Martin 2007 Dose only varied, not frequency
Moiz 2000 Only varied dosage, not frequency
Muirhead 1992 Injection frequency was not randomised; participants randomised to placebo (Group 1) and two groups maintaining Hb from 95 to 110 g/L (Group 2) or 115 to 130 g/L (Group 3)
Nissenson 1995 Safety and efficacy study of EPO vs. placebo
Parfrey 2005 Hb target study
PATRONUS Study 2009 Compared CERA and darbepoetin at same dose intervals
Pawlak 2007 Study of metalloproteinases with ESA
Provenzano 2006 Described two phase‐2 studies. Dialysis and non‐dialysis patients not separated
Raftery 2000 Not RCT
Schmitt 2006 Not relevant. Focus on pain
Smith 2007 Pharmacokinetic study
Smyth 2006 Not a frequency study
Spaia 1995 No mention of randomisation. Changed both dose and frequency
Spinowitz 2006 Dosage, no change in frequency
Stockenhuber 1990 Study of EPO effect on stem cells
Tan 1990a Not a frequency study
Tolman 2005 Computer‐assisted anaemia management
Wang 2000 Not clear how patients were allocated to treatment. Cross‐over study, wrote to authors to establish if patients were randomised ‐ no reply
Yalcinkaya 1997 Primary randomisation was to two different doses of rHuEPO