Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 12;22:7. doi: 10.1186/s40644-021-00438-y

Table 2.

Correlation analysis between the T1-weighted MR image-based features, T2-weighted MR image-based features and multi-level fusion-based features

Class T1 image T2 image
PET image 6 8
Matrix-level fusion 81 72
Feature-level fusion 68 71
Image-level fusion (0.1) 10 8
Image-level fusion (0.2) 11 8
Image-level fusion (0.3) 11 11
Image-level fusion (0.4) 11 14
Image-level fusion (0.5) 13 21
Image-level fusion (0.6) 14 56
Image-level fusion (0.7) 15 70
Image-level fusion (0.8) 48 76
Image-level fusion (0.9) 64 87

For the class column, the number in the parentheses indicated the fusion weight of the MR images. The “matrix-level fusion” indicated the T1/PET matrix fusion-based features for the correlation analysis with T1-weighted MR-based features, and the T2/PET matrix fusion-based features for the correlation analysis with T2-weighted MR-based features. The “feature-level fusion” indicated the feature average method based fusion