Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 24;29(2):306–320. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab184

Table 4.

Association between birth timing and obstetric history, sociodemographic, and clinical risk factors (Cox regression model)

Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Spontaneous Indicated Total
Sociodemographic factors
Maternal race
Caucasian ref ref ref
Black or African American 2.08 (0.54-8.03) 1.94 × 109 (0.00-inf) 1.73 (0.49-6.12)
Other 1.42 (0.49-4.15) 0.01 (0.00-0.54)a 1.17 (0.46-2.97)
Paternal race
Caucasian ref ref ref
Black or African American 0.67 (0.19-2.37) 5.78 × 10-10 (0.00-inf) 0.70 (0.21-2.33)
Other 0.68 (0.23-2.04) 30.85 (0.79-1208.15) 0.92 (0.36-2.36)
Maternal ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino ref ref ref
Hispanic or Latino 0.42 (0.13-1.36) 14.09 (0.14-1427.37) 0.46 (0.15-1.37)
Paternal ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino ref ref ref
Hispanic or Latino 2.19 (0.76-6.37) 0.23 (0.01-9.98) 2.26 (0.82-6.25)
Education level
Less than high school ref ref ref
High school or GED 1.32 (0.67-2.61) 2.30 (0.32-16.64) 1.36 (0.77-2.39)
College 0.92 (0.38-2.23) 2.21 (0.20-24.79) 0.80 (0.39-1.63)
Employment
Employed ref ref ref
Unemployed 0.90 (0.57-1.44) 1.17 (0.32-4.20) 0.85 (0.57-1.28)
Insurance status
Public ref ref ref
Private 0.63 (0.28-1.45) 0.07 (0.00-1.26) 0.62 (0.29-1.30)
None/self-pay 0.32 (0.08-1.26) 0.64 (0.02-26.79) 0.57 (0.19-1.73)
Marital status
Living with partner ref ref ref
Not living with partner 0.84 (0.47-1.50) 0.12 (0.02-0.80)a 0.75 (0.45-1.24)
Household income
$0-$12 000 ref ref ref
$12 001-$24 000 0.69 (0.34-1.40) 0.04 (0.01-0.31)a 0.64 (0.35-1.17)
$24 001-$50 000 1.31 (0.54-3.18) 0.02 (0.00-0.43)a 0.86 (0.41-1.82)
>$50 000 1.26 (0.48-3.32) 0.01 (0.00-0.29)a 1.13 (0.48-2.62)
Unknown 2.40 (1.24-4.66)a 3.77 × 10-11 (0.00-inf) 1.85 (1.04-3.30)a
Age 0.98 (0.92-1.04) 0.94 (0.77-1.15) 0.94 (0.89-0.99)a
BMI 0.98 (0.95-1.01) 0.91 (0.78-1.05) 0.98 (0.95-1.01)
Clinical phenotypes
Infection/inflammation
No evidence ref ref ref
Some evidence 1.18 (0.78-1.79) 1.83 (0.45-7.40) 1.12 (0.78-1.62)
Decidual hemorrhage
No evidence ref ref ref
Some evidence 3.64 (2.17-6.12)a 1.17 (0.19-7.08) 2.97 (1.88-4.69)a
Cervical insufficiency
No evidence ref ref ref
Some evidence 3.63 (2.00-6.58)a 2.20 (0.27-17.78) 3.00 (1.74-5.16)a
Placental dysfunction
No evidence ref ref ref
Possible evidence 1.67 (0.98-2.85) 0.36 (0.04-3.30) 1.16 (0.70-1.91)
Moderate evidence 1.07 (0.44-2.61) 10.70 (2.71-42.22)a 1.22 (0.71-2.11)
Family history
No evidence ref ref ref
Moderate evidence 0.54 (0.35-1.17) 0.23 (0.03-2.01) 0.55 (0.28-1.06)
Strong evidence 1.13 (0.74-1.72) 2.65 (0.72-9.73) 1.22 (0.84-1.78)
Maternal comorbidities
No evidence ref ref ref
Some evidence 1.04 (0.64-1.70) 1.96 (0.54-7.16) 1.05 (0.69-1.59)
Maternal stress
No evidence ref ref ref
Possible evidence 1.33 (0.74-2.39) 4.36 (0.93-20.47) 1.16 (0.70-1.90)
Strong evidence 1.29 (0.62-2.66) 1.23 (0.16-9.60) 1.27 (0.71-2.29)
Previous obstetric history
Previous caesarean section
No ref ref ref
Yes 1.65 (0.97-2.82) 4.83 (1.01-23.05)a 1.28 (0.82-2.00)
Number of previous deliveries 1.08 (0.90-1.30) 2.21 (1.17-4.20)a 1.25 (1.08-1.45)a
Number of abortions 1.01 (0.79-1.29) 3.33 (1.54-7.24)a 1.15 (0.93-1.42)
Time since last pregnancy 1.04 (0.94-1.14) 1.24 (0.95-1.62) 1.05 (0.96-1.14)
Previous birth weightb 1.00 (0.99-1.00)a 1.00 (0.99-1.00)a 1.00 (0.99-1.00)a
Model performance
Concordance 0.76 (SE = 0.02) 0.87 (SE = 0.04) 0.72 (SE = 0.02)
AIC 1212.706 239.2805 1593.33
Log-rank test 115.8 (P < .001)a 47.22 (P = .05)a 106.8 (P < .001)a

Hazard ratios and 95% CIs are presented for each category in regard to the reference group. Owing to a small number of participants in the dataset who had preterm indicated delivery (n = 25), maternal race and paternal race were perfectly collinear for the Black or African American category, which resulted in abnormal hazard ratios and infinite CIs. None of the participants who had an indicated preterm delivery had an unknown income, which led to a hazard ratio approaching zero and an infinite CI. Concordance, AIC values, and log-rank test statistics are presented as model performance measures. Higher concordance, lower AIC, and lower P values for log-rank test are characteristics of a better fit.

AIC: Akaike information criterion; BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval; inf: infinity; ref: reference.

a

Statistically significant value.

b

The 95% CI for previous birth weight does not cross the line of no effect. The upper CI value is reported as 1.00 due to rounding.