Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 13;181(4):1719–1725. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04376-0

Table 2.

Comparison on sleep patterns and ecology among both samples (before and during confinement)

Before confinement (n = 1380) During confinement (n = 254) comparison
Median IQR Median IQR p-value**
Bedtime 21:30 (21:00, 22:00) 21:36 (21.00, 22:30) 0.004
% CI 95% % CI 95% PR* 95%CI PR p-value
Total sleep time < 9 h**** 2.3 (1.59, 3.26) 2.8 (1.11, 5.59) 1.03 (0.39, 2.34) 0.950
 > 3 night awakenings 15.7 (13.84, 17.75) 12.6 (8.78, 17.32) 0.77 (0.51, 1.09) 0.153
Duration of awakenings > 1 h 16.7 (14.80, 18.81) 9.8 (6.47, 14.18) 0.57 (0.36, 0.86) 0.011
Sleep onset latency > 30 min 12.3 (10.63, 14.17) 33.9 (28.06, 40.04) 2.81 (2.13, 3.67)  < 0.001
“Inadequate” sleep patterns***:
                      0 items 65.3 (62.71, 67.80) 52.4 (46.02, 58.64) 0.81 (0.67, 0.98) 0.029
                      1 items 25.0 (22.73, 27.37) 37.8 (31.81, 44.07) 1.49 (1.17, 1.88)  < 0.001
                    ≥ 2 items 9.7 (8.20, 11.39) 9.8 (6.47, 14.18) 0.95 (0.59, 1.47) 0.844
Parental perception of a child’s sleep problem:
A small problem 21.4 (19.24, 23.63) 24.0 (18.89, 29.75) 1.10 (0.82, 1.45) 0.525
A very serious problem 18.1 (16.12, 20.25) 20.0 (15.33, 25.54) 1.11 (0.81, 1.51) 0.502
A small + a very serious 39.4 (36.90, 42.13) 44.1 (37.89, 50.34) 1.10 (0.89, 1.35) 0.363

*PR: prevalence ratio adjusted to sex, age of the child, relationship with the respondent, tobacco use, education, and sex of the respondent

**Mann–Whitney test

***According to BISQ criteria

****One missing data for total sleep time