Table 3. Alterations of the gut microbiota in the GDM women compared to the non-GDM women.
Studies | Liu et al. 2020 [40] | Mokkala et al. 2020 [45] | Zheng et al. 2020 [49] | Ma et al. 2020 [46] | Mokkala et al. 2017 [47] | Gomez-Arango et al. 2016 [48] | Koren et al. 2012 [12] | Wang et al. 2020 [50] | Liu et al. 2020 [40] | Chen et al. 2020 [51] | Zheng et al. 2020 [49] | Kuang et al. 2017 [52] | Li et al. 2021 [54] | Xu et al. 2020 [53] | Cui et al. 2020 [55] | Wu et al. 2019 [56] | Liu et al. 2019 [57] | Cortez et al. 2018 [58] | Wang et al. 2018 [59] | Crusell et al. 2018 [60] | Koren et al. 2012 [12] | Crusell et al. 2018 [60] | Fugmann et al. 2015 [61] | Hasan et al. 2018 [62] | Hou et al. 2020 [63] | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time-point | First trimester/ early pregnancy | Second trimester | Third trimester | Postpartum | ? | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beta diversity | Total D | Total N | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beta diversity | N | N | N | D | N | N | D | D | D | N | D | D | D | N | D | N | D | N | N | N | N | N | 9 | 13 | |||
Alpha diversity | Total ↓ | Total ↑ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Richness | ↓ | N | ↓ | N | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | N | N | ↓ | ↑ | N | N | N | N | 6 | 1 | ||||||||||
Evenness | N | N | ↓↑ | N | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | N | ↓ | ↑ | N | N | ↓ | N | N | N | N | N | 6 | 2 | |||||||
Phylum level | Total ↓ | Total ↑ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actinobacteria | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Bacteroidetes | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Firmicutes | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Class level | Total ↓ | Total ↑ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actinobacteria | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Bacteroidia | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Clostridia | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Order level | Total ↓ | Total ↑ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coriobacteriales | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | 0 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Clostridiales | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Family level | Total ↓ | Total ↑ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coriobacteriaceae | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Lachnospiraceae | ↓↑ | ↑ | ↑ | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ruminococcaceae | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Genus level | Total ↓ | Total ↑ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collinsella | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Eggerthella | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Bacteroides | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ruminococcus2 | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Blautia | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Coprococcus | ↓ | ↓ | ↑ | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Roseburia | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Faecalibacterium | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | ↓↑ | ↓↑ | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fusobacterium | ↓ | ↑ | ↓ | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sutterella | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Akkermansia | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | 1 | 2 |
Bacteria are illustrated if they are significantly different in relative abundance between cases and controls in 3 or more of the included studies. ↑ indicates a higher alpha diversity or bacteria are more abundant in the GDM group compared to the control group. ↓ indicates a lower alpha diversity or bacteria are less abundant in the GDM group compared to the control group. ↓↑ indicates significantly differences in opposing directions in alpha diversity or specific bacteria abundance. D indicates a significant difference in beta diversity between the GDM and the control group. N indicates no difference in beta diversity between the groups. A question mark (?) indicates unknown sample collection time point.