Appendix 1—table 2. Mixed effects models on model-agnostic choice data from uncertainty trials.
Name | Estimate | SE | t-Stat | DF | p-Value | Lower CI | Upper CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preferential MFCA for the informative destination (ghost-nominated, ‘repeat trials’ > ghost-rejected, ‘switch trials’)MFCA ~ NOM*DRUG*ORDER + (NOM + DRUG + ORDER | PART) | |||||||
(Intercept) | 0.10 | 0.01 | 8.27 | 239 | 0.000 | 0.07 | 0.12 |
NOM (nomination) | 0.03 | 0.02 | 1.57 | 239 | 0.117 | –0.01 | 0.08 |
DRUG | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.40 | 239 | 0.687 | –0.04 | 0.06 |
ORDER | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 239 | 0.895 | –0.04 | 0.05 |
NOM*DRUG | 0.11 | 0.04 | 2.73 | 239 | 0.007 | 0.03 | 0.19 |
NOM*ORDER | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.51 | 239 | 0.613 | –0.06 | 0.10 |
DRUG*ORDER | –0.03 | 0.05 | –0.73 | 239 | 0.467 | –0.12 | 0.06 |
NOM*DRUG*ORDER | –0.01 | 0.09 | –0.04 | 239 | 0.966 | –0.18 | 0.17 |
MFCA for non-informative destination (ghost-nominated > ghost-rejected, ‘clash trials’)REPEAT ~ N*I*DRUG*ORDER + (N*I*DRUG + ORDER | PART) | |||||||
(Intercept) | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1.27 | 479 | 0.203 | –0.03 | 0.12 |
N (non-informative) | 0.13 | 0.07 | 1.96 | 479 | 0.051 | 0.00 | 0.26 |
I (informative) | 1.01 | 0.10 | 9.95 | 479 | 0.000 | 0.81 | 1.21 |
DRUG | 0.16 | 0.07 | 2.31 | 479 | 0.021 | 0.02 | 0.29 |
ORDER | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.41 | 479 | 0.684 | –0.10 | 0.16 |
N*U | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.57 | 479 | 0.568 | –0.19 | 0.35 |
N*DRUG | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.39 | 479 | 0.696 | –0.21 | 0.31 |
I*DRUG | 0.03 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 479 | 0.810 | –0.25 | 0.32 |
N*ORDER | –0.05 | 0.13 | –0.34 | 479 | 0.733 | –0.30 | 0.21 |
I*ORDER | 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.43 | 479 | 0.664 | –0.22 | 0.35 |
DRUG*ORDER | –0.20 | 0.15 | –1.37 | 479 | 0.171 | –0.49 | 0.09 |
N*I*DRUG | 0.07 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 479 | 0.798 | –0.49 | 0.64 |
N*I*ORDER | 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.86 | 479 | 0.388 | –0.32 | 0.81 |
N*DRUG*ORDER | –0.47 | 0.26 | –1.80 | 479 | 0.072 | –0.99 | 0.04 |
I*DRUG*ORDER | –0.12 | 0.41 | –0.31 | 479 | 0.759 | –0.92 | 0.67 |
N*I*DRUG*ORDER | 0.86 | 0.55 | 1.56 | 479 | 0.119 | –0.22 | 1.94 |