Appendix 1—table 3. Mixed effects models on parameters of the computational model.
Name | Estimate | SE | t-Stat | DF | p-Value | Lower CI | Upper CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFCA for ghost-nominated vs. ghost-rejected and informative vs. non-informativeMFCA ~ NOM*INFO*DRUG*ORDER + (NOM*INFO*DRUG + ORDER | PART) | |||||||
(Intercept) | 0.18 | 0.02 | 7.60 | 480 | 0.000 | 0.14 | 0.23 |
NOM (nomination) | 0.10 | 0.03 | 3.72 | 480 | 0.000 | 0.05 | 0.15 |
INFO (informativeness) | 0.08 | 0.04 | 2.19 | 480 | 0.029 | 0.01 | 0.15 |
DRUG | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.94 | 480 | 0.347 | –0.05 | 0.16 |
ORDER | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.73 | 480 | 0.463 | –0.06 | 0.15 |
NOM*INFO | –0.03 | 0.05 | –0.57 | 480 | 0.567 | –0.12 | 0.06 |
NOM*DRUG | 0.10 | 0.04 | 2.43 | 480 | 0.015 | 0.02 | 0.18 |
INFO*DRUG | –0.08 | 0.07 | –1.16 | 480 | 0.247 | –0.22 | 0.06 |
NOM*ORDER | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.37 | 480 | 0.715 | –0.07 | 0.10 |
INFO*ORDER | 0.10 | 0.07 | 1.42 | 480 | 0.157 | –0.04 | 0.23 |
DRUG*ORDER | –0.09 | 0.10 | –0.98 | 480 | 0.328 | –0.28 | 0.10 |
NOM*INFO*DRUG | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.33 | 480 | 0.738 | –0.12 | 0.17 |
NOM*INFO*ORDER | –0.01 | 0.07 | –0.08 | 480 | 0.934 | –0.15 | 0.14 |
NOM*DRUG*ORDER | –0.06 | 0.11 | –0.60 | 480 | 0.551 | –0.27 | 0.15 |
INFO*DRUG*ORDER | 0.16 | 0.14 | 1.10 | 480 | 0.272 | –0.12 | 0.44 |
NOM*INFO*DRUG*ORDER | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.55 | 480 | 0.585 | –0.26 | 0.47 |
Preferential MFCA for informative vs. non-informativePMFCA ~ INFO*DRUG*ORDER + (INFO + DRUG + ORDER | PART) | |||||||
(Intercept) | 0.10 | 0.03 | 3.71 | 240 | 0.000 | 0.05 | 0.15 |
INFO (informativeness) | –0.03 | 0.05 | –0.57 | 240 | 0.568 | –0.12 | 0.07 |
DRUG | 0.10 | 0.04 | 2.39 | 240 | 0.017 | 0.02 | 0.18 |
ORDER | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.36 | 240 | 0.720 | –0.07 | 0.10 |
INFO*DRUG | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.34 | 240 | 0.734 | –0.12 | 0.17 |
INFO*ORDER | –0.01 | 0.07 | –0.08 | 240 | 0.933 | –0.15 | 0.14 |
DRUG*ORDER | –0.06 | 0.11 | –0.60 | 240 | 0.552 | –0.27 | 0.15 |
INFO*DRUG*ORDER | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.55 | 240 | 0.585 | –0.27 | 0.47 |