MAST‐I 1995.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Concealment: telephone central office Assessor blind (telephone follow‐up) Exclusions during trial: none Losses to follow‐up: none |
|
Participants | Europe 309 participants 163 (53%) male 22% aged < 60 years, 46% aged 61–75 years 100% CT before entry Ischaemic stroke < 6 hours since stroke onset |
|
Interventions | Factorial design of streptokinase and aspirin vs no treatment; only aspirin alone vs no aspirin included to prevent confounding influence of streptokinase Treatment: aspirin 300 mg oral (or IV/rectal) 24 hourly Control: no treatment Duration: 10 days |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Funding source | Partly supported by Pierrel SpA, Italy and Pharmacia Therapeutics, Sweden. Pharmacia provided streptokinase and Rhône‐Poulenc Rorer and Sanofi‐Winthrop supplied aspirin. The Stroke Association supported the UK centres (unclear what this involved). |
|
Notes | Exclusions: coma, bleeding risk Follow‐up: 6 months |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomisation lists were generated by computer and stratified by centre. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | 2 × 2 factorial study design used for randomisation. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) all outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear if participants were blinded. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) all outcomes | Low risk | No concerns regarding blinding of outcome assessment. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) all outcomes | Low risk | No missing outcome data. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Study protocol available. |
Other bias | Low risk | No sources of other bias identified. |