Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 2;59(1):1–19. doi: 10.1007/s00592-021-01767-x

Table 3.

Criteria used for T1DM-related DSPN diagnosis in the clinical studies included in the review

Diagnostic criteria Total clinical studies, n (%) Epidemiological studies, n Pathophysiological studies, n Diagnostic tests studies, n Other studies, n
Neuropathy symptoms and/or signs 20 (14.08%) 2 6 9 3
Toronto consensus criteria 18 (12.68%) 2 4 10 2
NCS + neuropathy symptoms and/or signs and/or questionnaires (NDS/NSS) 16 (11.26%) 2 4 7 3
NCS 13 (9.15%) 3 4 5 1
NDS 9 (6.33%) 1 5 3 0
QST, 1 test 8 (5.63%) 0 6 1 1
MNSI 6 (4.22%) 3 1 0 2
ADA 4 (2.82%) 2 2 0 0
NDS + NSS 4 (2.82%) 1 1 2 0
NCS + QST + neuropathy signs or questionnaires 4 (2.82%) 0 0 4 0
San Antonio criteria 3 (2.11%) 2 1 0 0
NSS 2 (1.41%) 0 0 2 0
QST, 2 tests 2 (1.41%) 1 0 1 0
QST, 3 tests 2 (1.41%) 1 1 0 0
QST + neurological examination abnormalities and/or questionnaires 2 (1.41%) 1 0 1 0
Other criteria 29 (20.42%) 2 5 22 0
Clinical studies for each category, n 142 (100%) 23 40 67 12

NCS nerve conduction study, NDS Neuropathy Disability Score, NSS neuropathy symptom score, QST quantitative sensory testing, MNSI Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, ADA American Diabetes Association