Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 2;59(1):1–19. doi: 10.1007/s00592-021-01767-x

Table 4.

Summary of key epidemiological and clinical findings regarding T1DM-related DSPN

Analyzed variables in T1DM-related DSPN % (n of studies) Other observations (n of studies)
DSPN prevalence in adults 14–44.3% (19) Lower prevalence of DSPN in T1DM compared with T2DM (7)
DSPN prevalence in childhood 25.9% [21–34.1%] (8)* T1DM-related DSPN prevalence in childhood is slightly lower than in adults
Neuropathic pain prevalence 5.8–18.9% (3)** Neuropathic pain prevalence is lower in T1DM compared with T2DM-related DSPN (4)
Non-painful symptoms prevalence 13.3–65.7% (9) Non-painful symptoms are more frequent than neuropathic pain in T1DM-related DSPN (4)
Subclinical neuropathy prevalence 35–96.6% (8) -
Ankle reflexes abnormalities frequency 2–75% (9) Frequency of large fiber-mediated signs (ankle reflexes abnormalities and vibration hypoesthesia) is higher compared with small fiber-related signs (thermal and pinprick hypoesthesia) in T1DM-related DSPN
Vibration hypoesthesia 5.1–69% (14)
Thermal hypoesthesia 8.3–43.8% (8)
Pinprick hypoesthesia 0–23% (3)
Main risk factors for DSPN T1DM duration (11), HbA1c (8), age (6), hypertension (5), smoking (4), retinopathy (3), nephropathy (3), dyslipidemia (3) BMI and male sex, two frequently reported risk factors for T2DM-related DSPN, were never reported for T1DM-related DSPN
Main risk factors for neuropathic pain Diabetes duration (2), age (2), female sex (2) T1DM- and T2DM-related DSPN share risk factors for neuropathic pain

(n studies) is the number of studies reporting the analyzed variable. *DSPN prevalence in childhood was calculated through a meta-analysis of 8 studies based on similar diagnostic criteria; **Neuropathic pain prevalence estimation was based on the 3 studies using the DN4 questionnaire for neuropathic pain diagnosis, a widely agreed screening tool for neuropathic pain.