Table 3.
Efficiency comparison of the results of other group reported in ambient air process perovskite solar cell.
| YYYY.MM | PCE (%) | Cell area (cm2) | Device structure | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015.04 | 10.1 | 0.24 | ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/PCBM/BCP/Ag | 59 |
| 2015.09 | 18.0 | ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/PCBM/Ca/Al | 29 | |
| 2015.09 | 9.4 | 0.092 | FTO/TiO2/Al2O3 + Perovskite/SWCNTs/PMMA/Ag | 60 |
| 2016.10 | 12.0 | ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/PCBM/C60/BCP/Ag | 61 | |
| 2016.10 | 16.3 | 0.05 | ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/PCBM/PDINO/Al | 62 |
| 2017.01 | 18.1 | 0.1 | ITO/Poly-TPD/Perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 63 |
| 2017.02 | 15.6 | 0.126 | FTO/TiO2/Perovskite/ZrO2/Carbon | 64 |
| 2018.01 | 18.7 | 4.85 | ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 65 |
| 2018.12 | 17.1 | 0.1 | ITO/PEDOT:PSS/Perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 66 |
| This work | 15.1 | 0.16 | FTO/TiO2/Perovskite/Spiro-MeOTAD/Ag |